1976
DOI: 10.2307/2040750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherence of Polynomial Rings

Abstract: Abstract. The main result is that A [X], the polynomial ring in any number of indeterminates over a coherent ring A of global dimension two, is coherent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pullbacks were considered in [19] for providing an appropriate unified setting for several important "composite-type" constructions introduced in various contexts of commutative ring theory in order to construct examples and counter-examples with different pathologies: for instance, Seidenberg's constructions for (polynomial) dimensional sequences [43], Nagata's composition of valuation domains and "K + J (R)" constructions [39, p. 35 and Appendix A1, Example 2], Akiba's AV-domains or Dobbs' divided domains [1,16], Gilmer's "D + M" constructions [26], Traverso's glueings for a constructive approach to the seminormalization [44], Vasconcelos' umbrella rings and Greenberg's F-domains [27,45], Boisen-Sheldon's CPI-extensions [13], HedstromHouston's pseudo-valuation domains [29], "D + XD S [X]" rings and more generally, the "A + XB[X]" rings considered by many authors (see the recent excellent survey papers by T. Lucas [35] and M. Zafrullah [46], which contain ample and updated bibliographies on this subject).…”
Section: Introduction and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pullbacks were considered in [19] for providing an appropriate unified setting for several important "composite-type" constructions introduced in various contexts of commutative ring theory in order to construct examples and counter-examples with different pathologies: for instance, Seidenberg's constructions for (polynomial) dimensional sequences [43], Nagata's composition of valuation domains and "K + J (R)" constructions [39, p. 35 and Appendix A1, Example 2], Akiba's AV-domains or Dobbs' divided domains [1,16], Gilmer's "D + M" constructions [26], Traverso's glueings for a constructive approach to the seminormalization [44], Vasconcelos' umbrella rings and Greenberg's F-domains [27,45], Boisen-Sheldon's CPI-extensions [13], HedstromHouston's pseudo-valuation domains [29], "D + XD S [X]" rings and more generally, the "A + XB[X]" rings considered by many authors (see the recent excellent survey papers by T. Lucas [35] and M. Zafrullah [46], which contain ample and updated bibliographies on this subject).…”
Section: Introduction and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first authors to consider pullback rings with zero divisors were probably Greenberg and Vasconcelos (1974 [31], 1976 [32]). They aimed to classify rings of weak global dimension 2 and considered a very specialized conductor square where i 1 is a flat epimorphism, Q is a flat ideal of R, and QS = S. Fontana (1980 [19]) and Cahen (1988 [13]) also considered a number of properties of pullback rings with zero divisors in a slightly less restrictive setting than the above conductor square.…”
Section: Pullback Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If gl.dim D 2 and w.gl.dim T 2, then R is coherent and w.gl.dim R 2.Proof. By[28, Proposition 4.1], R is coherent. Apply Theorem 4.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%