2009
DOI: 10.1364/oe.17.009357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherence between two coupled lasers from a dynamics perspective

Abstract: Abstract:We compare a simple dynamical model of fiber laser arrays with independent experiments on two coupled lasers. The degree of agreement with experimental observations is excellent. Collectively the evidence presented supports this dynamical approach as an alternative to the traditional static eigenmode analysis of the coupled laser cavities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is a refined version of the one introduced in [10] appropriate for four-level lasers; we will consider the three-level case later in the paper. This model has been shown to accurately reproduce various experimental observations reported for single-and coupled-fiber systems [13], [18]. A schematic of the system is shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…This model is a refined version of the one introduced in [10] appropriate for four-level lasers; we will consider the three-level case later in the paper. This model has been shown to accurately reproduce various experimental observations reported for single-and coupled-fiber systems [13], [18]. A schematic of the system is shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…This problem is discussed extensively in [22,23,31]; 2. the analysis presented sets bounds for the robustness of a model, and it is straightforward enough to be implemented in any algorithm that creates a template out of a time series. It is noted that low-dimensional, noisy discrete-time mappings are still widely used as models in several fields of science and engineering [32,33,34].…”
Section: Conclusion Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscripts j in (1) and (2) correspond to the j th element of the array. The specific terms in (1) are as follow: E is the slowly-varying electric field envelope, g is the gain (as a function of t and z), α is the propagation loss, β 1 is the reciprocal of the group velocity, b describes frequencydependent losses, β 2 is the group velocity dispersion (GVD), and γ is the coefficient of the non-resonant Kerr nonlinearity given by γ = 2πn 2 /λA e f f [14] (with n 2 the nonlinear refractive index and A ef f the effective mode area).…”
Section: A Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial models required a fixed phase difference as an input and did not yield spectral information [1], [2]. A more recent model focused on a Q-switching instability found from a linear stability analysis and presented only a few preliminary results from the numerical solution of the propagation equations [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%