2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohen-Macaulay differential graded modules and negative Calabi-Yau configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many extriangulated categories which a neither exact nor triangulated. For example, it is shown in [8,Theorem 2.4] that the category of Cohen-Macaulay differential graded modules over certain Gorenstein differential graded algebras is extriangulated. Another is the subcategory K [−1,0] (proj ), which is the subcategory of complexes concetrated in degree -1 and degree 0 in K b (proj ), where is an Artin algebra; see [15,Proposition 4.39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many extriangulated categories which a neither exact nor triangulated. For example, it is shown in [8,Theorem 2.4] that the category of Cohen-Macaulay differential graded modules over certain Gorenstein differential graded algebras is extriangulated. Another is the subcategory K [−1,0] (proj ), which is the subcategory of complexes concetrated in degree -1 and degree 0 in K b (proj ), where is an Artin algebra; see [15,Proposition 4.39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore by Lemma 2.13 pd M j = pd M j−1 − 1 − supM j−1 + supM j for j ≤ i. Thus, we have (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) pd It remains to prove the implication (4) ⇒ (1).…”
Section: Sup-projective Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Let φ : Q 3 → Q ′′ 2 and φ ′ : Q ′′ 2 → Q 3 be the retraction and the section of the left direct sum decomposition of (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Let ψ : Q 2 → Q ′′ 2 and ψ ′ : Q ′′ 2 → Q 2 be the retraction and the section of of the middle direct sum decomposition (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Note that we have δ 3 = ψ ′ φ .…”
Section: Sup-projective Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations