Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of the Lexicon - COGALEX '08 2008
DOI: 10.3115/1598848.1598864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitively salient relations for multilingual lexicography

Abstract: Providing sets of semantically related words in the lexical entries of an electronic dictionary should help language learners quickly understand the meaning of the target words. Relational information might also improve memorisation, by allowing the generation of structured vocabulary study lists. However, an open issue is which semantic relations are cognitively most salient, and should therefore be used for dictionary construction. In this paper, we present a concept description elicitation experiment conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, some concept classes have similar distributions within a language, most evidently "fruit" and "vegetables" in the German data, which makes sense given that they both can be subsumed under the broad class of "eatable plants"; other classes have markedly different distributions, e.g., compare "fruit" and "implements", where for "implements" a lot of relations of types part and function were produced in contrast to the "fruit" class, which in turn is characterised by a larger number of category and quality relations than in the "implement" class. Further research on this data set investigating the cognitive salience of semantic relations is presented in Kremer, Abel, and Baroni (2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, some concept classes have similar distributions within a language, most evidently "fruit" and "vegetables" in the German data, which makes sense given that they both can be subsumed under the broad class of "eatable plants"; other classes have markedly different distributions, e.g., compare "fruit" and "implements", where for "implements" a lot of relations of types part and function were produced in contrast to the "fruit" class, which in turn is characterised by a larger number of category and quality relations than in the "implement" class. Further research on this data set investigating the cognitive salience of semantic relations is presented in Kremer, Abel, and Baroni (2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'n Tesourus is nie 'n bekende en algemeen gebruikte leksikografiese naslaanbron onder onderwysers nie. Tog verwys Tasovac (2012: 242) na navorsing in opvoedkundige leksikografie wat daarop dui dat die voorsiening van stelle semanties verwante woorde in 'n leksikografiese inskrywing taalaanleerders kan help om betekenis te verstaan en hul memorisering te verbeter (Geckeler 2002, Kremer et al 2008. Van Schalkwyk (1996: 286) beveel in 'n resensie van die Groot Tesourus van Afrikaans die onderrig van tesourusgebruik aan deur dit as 'n "noodsaaklikheid" te bestempel: Waarop die voorafgaande afstuur, is die wenslikheid, nee, noodsaaklikheid dat die bestaan en waardevolle gebruike van die tesourus as besondere soort woordeboek dieselfde gebruiksfrekwensie verkry as verklarende en vertalende (tweetalige) woordeboeke.…”
Section: Inleidingunclassified