2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
282
3
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
23
282
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is puzzling given the clinical and theoretical relevance of the question. Cognitive theories of depression have repeatedly emphasized the role of a biased processing of emotional information in the development and maintenance of depression (Beck et al, 1979;Clark et al, 1999;Beevers, 2005), with recent empirical studies reliably demonstrating a general cognitive inflexibility or inability to inhibit or to disengage from intrusive, irrelevant and negative information, leading to recurrent and remaining patterns of negative thoughts and feelings (Koster et al, 2005;Mogg and Bradley, 2005;Goeleven et al, 2006;Joormann, 2006;Leyman et al, 2007). In line with these findings, recent functional imaging studies have shown disruptions in the prefrontal activation patterns of depressive patients (Mayberg, 1997(Mayberg, , 2007Drevets, 2000;Leppänen, 2006), brain regions found to be important in the implementation of top-down attentional control (MacDonald et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is puzzling given the clinical and theoretical relevance of the question. Cognitive theories of depression have repeatedly emphasized the role of a biased processing of emotional information in the development and maintenance of depression (Beck et al, 1979;Clark et al, 1999;Beevers, 2005), with recent empirical studies reliably demonstrating a general cognitive inflexibility or inability to inhibit or to disengage from intrusive, irrelevant and negative information, leading to recurrent and remaining patterns of negative thoughts and feelings (Koster et al, 2005;Mogg and Bradley, 2005;Goeleven et al, 2006;Joormann, 2006;Leyman et al, 2007). In line with these findings, recent functional imaging studies have shown disruptions in the prefrontal activation patterns of depressive patients (Mayberg, 1997(Mayberg, , 2007Drevets, 2000;Leppänen, 2006), brain regions found to be important in the implementation of top-down attentional control (MacDonald et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly influential cognitive psychology work in dual systems ( [31,14,18,6,17,28]) is based on two reasoning systems: one system that is slow but logically precise and another system that is fast but logically sloppy. In this paper we consider the problem of argument evaluation and, based on critical questions satisfaction, extend the classical notions of argument acceptance statuses.…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, eye-tracking methodology has been also used for assessing emotion regulation (Sanchez, Vazquez, Gomez, & Joormann, 2014). Although cognitive measures have some clear advantages, is not easy to discard the differential contribution of emotion regulation and cognitive schemas as sources of influences on cognitive processing, especially since a sad mood induction can simultaneously activate latent negative schemas and mood regulation (see for a review, Beevers, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%