2021
DOI: 10.1177/13621688211021821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development

Abstract: Studies have documented the significance of scaffolding as a sociocultural theory driven type of assistance for the development of English as foreign language (EFL) learners’ language skills in general; however, the comparative efficacy of various cognitive and/or metacognitive scaffolding procedures for EFL learners’ listening comprehension development and progress has received scant attention. As a partial attempt in this regard, this study investigated the comparative efficacy of cognitive and metacognitive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was in line with the findings of previous studies revealing that scant attention has been paid to cross-cultural understanding and intercultural skills in educational policy of Iran, in general, and in many EFL textbooks taught in this system, in particular (e.g. Ahmadi Safa et al, 2015; Hayati & Mashhadi, 2010; Razmjoo, 2007). In a similar vein, Borjian (2013) has declared that in Iran, the national English curriculum gives priority to syntactical, phonological, and morphological dimensions of the language while considering its sociocultural aspects as unsuitable to be taught.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was in line with the findings of previous studies revealing that scant attention has been paid to cross-cultural understanding and intercultural skills in educational policy of Iran, in general, and in many EFL textbooks taught in this system, in particular (e.g. Ahmadi Safa et al, 2015; Hayati & Mashhadi, 2010; Razmjoo, 2007). In a similar vein, Borjian (2013) has declared that in Iran, the national English curriculum gives priority to syntactical, phonological, and morphological dimensions of the language while considering its sociocultural aspects as unsuitable to be taught.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of this study corroborated those of the previous ones (e.g. Ahmadi Safa et al, 2015;Canale, 2016;Kramsch, 1987) that acknowledged the failure of textbooks in terms of culture teaching. In the light of these findings, I devise here a practical model for the evaluation of culture representation in textbooks, as presented in Figure 5.…”
Section: Conclusion and Pedagogical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As with ER, building listening fluency also takes time and effort; the other language learning benefits emerge with time (Renandya & Jacobs, 2016). In addition, reading while listening proved to assist in fostering reading skills (Ahmadi Safa & Motaghi, 2021). Reading-while-listening is advantageous in second language learning, as Hossain et al found that readingwhile-listening can result in more vocabulary knowledge (Hossain & Hasan, 2022).…”
Section: Instructional Strategy For Comprehensible Meaning-focused Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One alternative assessment that has recently attracted a lot of attention in science education and language evaluation is the DA (Ahmadi Safa & Beheshti, 2018). For educators to conduct evaluations or measurements at that time, this assessment seeks to mediate or scaffold pupils during the assessment process (Van der Veen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Dynamic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%