2021
DOI: 10.1360/ssi-2020-0370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive vision inspired object segmentation metric and loss function

Abstract: 物体分割技术在计算机领域有着广泛的应用基础, 如图像分割 [1] 、显著目标分割 [2∼6] 、多模态显 著物体分割 [7] 、协同显著目标分割 [8] 、前背景提取 [9] 、视频目标分割 [10] 以及目标检测与识别 [11,12] 等. 在这些应用当中, 为了评估模型算法的优劣, 将物体分割模型输出结果 (foreground map, FM) 与 标准结果 (ground-truth, GT) 进行定量比较是必不可少的, 通常需要引入评价标准去衡量两者之间的 相似度. 本文主要研究二类 (目标类被标记为白色, 非目标类则为黑色) 物体分割 1) 评价标准. 目前广 1) 本文在后续的章节将二值前景图等同于二类物体分割结果图.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following recommendations from common methods for polyp segmentation [ 21 , 42 ], we utilized mean Dice ( ), mean IoU ( ), mean absolute error (MAE) [ 54 ], weighted F-measure ( ) [ 55 ], S-measure ( ) [ 56 ], and mean E-measure ( ) [ 57 ] as our assessment indicators for comprehensively investigating our model’s performance. Among these indicators, and were regional level similarity measures and mainly highlighted the internal consistency of segmented objects.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recommendations from common methods for polyp segmentation [ 21 , 42 ], we utilized mean Dice ( ), mean IoU ( ), mean absolute error (MAE) [ 54 ], weighted F-measure ( ) [ 55 ], S-measure ( ) [ 56 ], and mean E-measure ( ) [ 57 ] as our assessment indicators for comprehensively investigating our model’s performance. Among these indicators, and were regional level similarity measures and mainly highlighted the internal consistency of segmented objects.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that the number after each dataset indicates its size. Evaluation Metrics: The widely used evaluation metrics include Mean Absolute Error, Mean F-measure [80], Mean E-measure [81] and S-measure [82] denoted as M, F β , E ξ , S α , respectively. Specifically, the F β and M focus on the local (per-pixel) match between ground truth and prediction, while S α pays attention to the object structure similarities.…”
Section: A Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a comprehensive evaluation of the performance, we adopt six universally-agreed metrics, including 1) S-measure (S m ) [49], 2) mean E-measure (E φ ) [50], 3) weighted F-measure (F w β ) [51], 4) mean absolute error (M ), 5)Precision-Recall curves, 6) F-measure curves. Note that for M , a lower value indicates better performance.…”
Section: A Datasets and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%