1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00778.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance

Abstract: Two new questionnaires were devised to investigate dimensions of complaint about tinnitus. Following a factor analysis of data provided by a sample of tinnitus patients who were administered the first questionnaire, the second questionnaire was developed. This included questions concerning coping attitudes and beliefs about tinnitus. The results of the two analyses were similar and they indicated the presence of three main dimensions of complaint (emotional distress, auditory perceptual difficulties, and sleep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
224
1
21

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 376 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
224
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…or the tinnitus minimum masking level ( t (41) = 1.14, n.s.). Patients were also asked to complete the German version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ, Hallam et al, 1988; Hallam, 1996) published by Goebel and Hiller (Goebel and Hiller, 1994, 1998). Musicians with tinnitus attained significantly lower scores than non-musicians with tinnitus on the TQ ( t (46) = 4.16, p < 0.0005) and its subscales (tinnitus intrusiveness: t (57) = 5.23, p < 0.0005, cognitive and emotional distress: t (46) = 3.78, p < 0.0005, somatic complaints: t (46) = 2.12, p < 0.05, auditory and perceptual difficulties: t (46) = 2.33, p < 0.025, sleep disturbances: t (46) = 2.41, p < 0.02).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or the tinnitus minimum masking level ( t (41) = 1.14, n.s.). Patients were also asked to complete the German version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ, Hallam et al, 1988; Hallam, 1996) published by Goebel and Hiller (Goebel and Hiller, 1994, 1998). Musicians with tinnitus attained significantly lower scores than non-musicians with tinnitus on the TQ ( t (46) = 4.16, p < 0.0005) and its subscales (tinnitus intrusiveness: t (57) = 5.23, p < 0.0005, cognitive and emotional distress: t (46) = 3.78, p < 0.0005, somatic complaints: t (46) = 2.12, p < 0.05, auditory and perceptual difficulties: t (46) = 2.33, p < 0.025, sleep disturbances: t (46) = 2.41, p < 0.02).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these attempt to quantify a combination of tinnitus related distress, disability and handicap resulting in a large overlap of their items. Among the most widely used are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (Newman et al, 1998), the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ) (Kuk et al, 1990), the Tinnitus Questionnaire (Hallam et al, 1988) and the Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ) (Wilson et al, 1991). Even though these instruments were not specifically designed to be sensitive to treatment related changes, all of them have been used as outcome measurers in clinical trials.…”
Section: Questionnaires As Instruments For Measuring Tinnitus and Relmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first attempt to extract such a list is attached. Abbreviations: KHz, Kilohertz; dB, Decibel; SL, Sensation level; MML, Minimal masking level; THI, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (Newman et al, 1998); THQ, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (Kuk et al, 1990); TRQ, Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (Wilson et al, 1991); TQ, Tinnitus Questionnaire (Hallam et al, 1988); BDI, Beck Depression Inventory (Beck and Steer, 1984); STAI, State Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger et al, 1970); WHODAS, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (McArdle et al, 2005); PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Buysse et al, 1989); Table 2 "Items list" for tinnitus case history questionnaires The items 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,12,16,19,21,26,27,28 are considered as essential (Category A) all other items are regarded as highly desireable (Category B)…”
Section: Questionnaires As Instruments For Measuring Tinnitus and Relmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 26 patients in our group had a bilateral, 6 a unilateral right sided, and 9 a unilateral left sided tinnitus. According to the tinnitus questionnaire of Goebel and Hiller (Goebel and Hiller 1998) (see below) which is a German version of the Hallam et al (1988) tinnitus questionnaire 26 of our patients could be classified as subjects with low tinnitus related distress (main score \47) whereas 15 of our patients exhibited a high tinnitus related distress (main score C47). When comparing patients with high and low tinnitus related distress no significant difference could be shown regarding age, hearing loss in any of the frequencies evaluated, pitch, minimal masking level using white noise, and threshold of uncomfortable loudness (Table 1).…”
Section: Tinnitus Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This questionnaire is a German version of the questionnaire by Hallam (Hallam et al 1988). It consists of 52 items.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Tinnitus Related Distressmentioning
confidence: 99%