2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive underpinnings of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, a previous study in Japan was in line with our finding, where people living in rural areas were also more willing to be vaccinated than those in urban areas ( Yoda and Katsuyama, 2021 ). First, one possible explanation for this difference is that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic was lower among urban participants than rural participants in our findings ( P < 0.05), which may influence the results regarding lower COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among urban participants ( Acar-Burkay and Cristian, 2022 ). Second, rural participants learned about the COVID-19 vaccine mostly via healthcare practitioners, whereas urban participants learned about the COVID-19 vaccine primarily from Internet sources (Appendix file: Table S1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Nonetheless, a previous study in Japan was in line with our finding, where people living in rural areas were also more willing to be vaccinated than those in urban areas ( Yoda and Katsuyama, 2021 ). First, one possible explanation for this difference is that the perceived severity of the COVID-19 epidemic was lower among urban participants than rural participants in our findings ( P < 0.05), which may influence the results regarding lower COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among urban participants ( Acar-Burkay and Cristian, 2022 ). Second, rural participants learned about the COVID-19 vaccine mostly via healthcare practitioners, whereas urban participants learned about the COVID-19 vaccine primarily from Internet sources (Appendix file: Table S1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Individual behaviors to reduce the spread of disease, such as washing one's hands, practicing social distancing, and getting vaccinated, have a large impact on controlling pandemics ( Fong et al, 2020 ; Mitze et al, 2020 ; Moghadas et al, 2021 ). Previous research has started to explore socio-demographic factors (e.g., gender, income, political orientation; Callaghan et al, 2021 ; da Fonseca et al, 2021 ; Liu and Li, 2021 ; Savoia et al, 2021 ), cognitive and affective constructs (e.g., anticipated regret, working memory, executive function; Acar-Burkay and Cristian, 2022 ; Capasso, Caso & Conner, 2021 ; Xie et al, 2020 ) and personality traits (e.g., the Big 5; Schmiedeberg and Thönnissen, 2021 ) that shape people's willingness to follow protective measures during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. We contribute to this research by identifying self-esteem as an important predictor of health-related behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 . According to previous studies, age, gender, and education level are associated with vaccine acceptance ( Acar-Burkay and Cristian, 2022 , Khan et al, 2021 ). In order to identify the potential demographic effects, we consider age, gender and education level as control variables in this study.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 97%