1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1981.tb00941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive style and literary regression A study of student writers1

Abstract: Forty undergraduates, from either beginning or advanced writing classes, and classified as either abstract or concrete thinkers from responses to the "This I Believe" test, provided two works of prose fiction, which were coded for the use of regression techniques. As predicted, abstract thinkers with advanced training were most likely to employ regression. The relations among abstract cognitive style, creative writing training, and literary regression are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow of creativity can be explained by the dynamic of the third thought process (an intermediate thought process between the Freudian primary and secondary thought processes) (Dimkov, 2015(Dimkov, , 2016. It essentially represents a regression in the name of the ego, where for short time there is a regression, but after it, there is a return to the normal functioning of the ego as secondary thought process (Kris, 1952;Silverman, 1965;Bush, 1969;Suler, 1980;Joffe & Peterson, 1981;Knafo, 2002;Martindale, 1999;Dimkov, 2015Dimkov, , 2016.…”
Section: A Miniature Of a Boundary Situation: A Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow of creativity can be explained by the dynamic of the third thought process (an intermediate thought process between the Freudian primary and secondary thought processes) (Dimkov, 2015(Dimkov, , 2016. It essentially represents a regression in the name of the ego, where for short time there is a regression, but after it, there is a return to the normal functioning of the ego as secondary thought process (Kris, 1952;Silverman, 1965;Bush, 1969;Suler, 1980;Joffe & Peterson, 1981;Knafo, 2002;Martindale, 1999;Dimkov, 2015Dimkov, , 2016.…”
Section: A Miniature Of a Boundary Situation: A Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%