1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00918896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive, social, and other correlates of specific reading retardation

Abstract: Children with specific reading retardation were matched with controls on the basis of age, sex, intelligence, and (less successfully) parental education. All subjects were tested on a variety of automated performance tests including the Matching Familiar Figures (MFF) Task, Auditory-Visual Integration, Short-Term Memory, the Continuous Performance Task (CPT), and Motor Performance. All children were assessed socially using the Conners Teacher Questionnaire, and reading-retarded children were rated on the Behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following learning and motor performance measures were included in the battery. Most of these are described in greater detail elsewhere (Aman, 1979) and have been extensively used in pediatric psychopharmacology and the study of hyperactivity. (Kagan, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following learning and motor performance measures were included in the battery. Most of these are described in greater detail elsewhere (Aman, 1979) and have been extensively used in pediatric psychopharmacology and the study of hyperactivity. (Kagan, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denney (1974) studying good and poor readers in grades two through five, found no differences on Kagan task for either errors on response latency, though there were significant correlations between Kagan MFFT errors and scores on oral reading test. Aman (1979) found children with specific reading retardation to make significantly more errors on the Kagan MFFT task than controls, but there were no significant differences in response latency. Thus the bulk of the evidence supports the relationship of accuracy on the MFFT to academic performance but fails to confirm the hypothesized importance of response latency.…”
Section: Impulsivitymentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The best evidence available suggests that teacher rated hyperactivity and learning disabilities may represent relatively independent factors (Lahey, Stempniak, Robinson, and Tyroler, 1978). Aman (1979) also found that children with specific reading retardation were not different from control subjects on teacher rated hyperactivity on the Conners scale.…”
Section: Overactivitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations