2017
DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1324845
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive screening tools for primary care settings: examining the ‘Test Your Memory’ and ‘General Practitioner assessment of Cognition’ tools in a rural aging population in Greece

Abstract: Background: Under conditions of high demand for primary care services in a setting of low financial resources, there is need for brief, easily administered cognitive screening tools for use in the primary care setting, especially in rural areas. However, interpretation of these cognitive tests’ results requires knowledge on their susceptibility to cultural, educational and demographic patient characteristics.Objectives: To assess the clinical validity of the ‘Test Your Memory’ (TYM) and ‘General Practitioner a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean TYM-I scores in our HC and MCI samples were lower than those in the control and MCI samples evaluated in Brown’s et al original studies ( Brown et al, 2009 ; Brown J. et al, 2019 ). However, results are inconsistent among investigations from different countries and several studies reported average scores in line with those of the present study in both controls ( Hancock and Larner, 2011 ; Abd-Al-Atty et al, 2012 ; van Schalkwyk et al, 2012 ; Muñoz-Neira et al, 2014 ; Postel-Vinay et al, 2014 ; Iatraki et al, 2014 , 2017 ; Kolozsvári et al, 2017 ; van de Zande et al, 2017 ; Li et al, 2018 ) and MCI patients ( Hancock and Larner, 2011 ; Muñoz-Neira et al, 2014 ; van de Zande et al, 2017 ). Whether this heterogeneity might be partly attributed to a difference in educational levels should be accurately addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean TYM-I scores in our HC and MCI samples were lower than those in the control and MCI samples evaluated in Brown’s et al original studies ( Brown et al, 2009 ; Brown J. et al, 2019 ). However, results are inconsistent among investigations from different countries and several studies reported average scores in line with those of the present study in both controls ( Hancock and Larner, 2011 ; Abd-Al-Atty et al, 2012 ; van Schalkwyk et al, 2012 ; Muñoz-Neira et al, 2014 ; Postel-Vinay et al, 2014 ; Iatraki et al, 2014 , 2017 ; Kolozsvári et al, 2017 ; van de Zande et al, 2017 ; Li et al, 2018 ) and MCI patients ( Hancock and Larner, 2011 ; Muñoz-Neira et al, 2014 ; van de Zande et al, 2017 ). Whether this heterogeneity might be partly attributed to a difference in educational levels should be accurately addressed in future studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The TYM is a brief screening tool to detect cognitive dysfunction. Several validation studies were conducted to assess the TYM performances in detecting Alzheimer’s disease patients across different regions and clinical settings, such as memory clinic and primary care ( Hanyu et al, 2011 ; van Schalkwyk et al, 2012 ; Szczesniak and Wojtynska, 2013 ; Muñoz-Neira et al, 2014 ; Iatraki et al, 2017 ; Brown J. et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the MMSE Thai 2002 is highly specific but less sensitive in identifying cognitive impairment, particularly amongst illiterate subjects (sensitivity ¼ 0.35, specificity ¼ 0.81) [11]. Nevertheless, it has been used as a clinical screening tool in Thailand and it is most often used as a known reference standard against which other cognitive screening tests are compared and has the major advantage of being widely understood [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In a large study carried out with MMSE in the Chinese elderly population, the number of years of formal education, residence in rural areas, age and female gender had a significant influence on the reduction of MMSE scores. 11 Iatraki et al 12 applied the MMSE and two other screening instruments to 319 elderly rural dwellers in Greece and observed that lower MMSE values were related to older women with lower levels of schooling and with greater dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%