“…Most studies measured all EMS within the relevant YSQ version that was used ( n = 24). However, one study only measured Defectiveness/Shame, Emotional Inhibition, Insufficient Self‐Control and Social Isolation subscales (Hovrud et al., 2020). Two studies only measured EMS within the Disconnection/Rejection domain (Jenkins et al., 2013; De Paoli et al., 2017), one study only measured certain domains (i.e., Exaggerated Vigilance/Inhibition, Disconnection and Impaired Autonomy) and subscales (i.e., Unrelenting Standards, Emotional Inhibition; Legenbauer et al., 2018) and one study only measured Defectiveness, Failure and Unrelenting Standards (Deas et al., 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies reported the assumptions of statistical analyses (Deas et al., 2011; Hinrichsen et al., 2004, 2007; Hovrud et al., 2020; Jenkins et al., 2013; Leung et al., 1999, 2000; Meyer et al., 2001; Waller et al., 2001, 2002). One study explicitly stated their assumption testing (Hovrud et al., 2020), whereas the remaining nine studies reported more generally (i.e., data were sufficiently well distributed to allow for the use of parametric analyses; Hinrichsen et al., 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported being underpowered in their limitations (Basile et al., 2019; Boone et al., 2013; George et al., 2004; Hinrichsen et al., 2004; Imperatori et al., 2017; Lawson et al., 2008; Legenbauer et al., 2018; Leung & Price, 2007; Leung et al., 1999; Rania et al., 2019). Interestingly, 13 studies did not report any sample size power estimations (Elmquist et al., 2015; Gongora et al., 2004; Hinrichsen et al., 2007; Hovrud et al., 2020; Hughes et al., 2006; Jenkins et al., 2013; Meyer et al., 2001; Pauwels et al., 2018; Sines et al., 2008; Unoka et al., 2007, 2010; Voderholzer et al., 2014; Waller et al., 2001). Only three studies arguably had sufficiently large sample sizes (Elmquist et al., 2015; Hinrichsen et al., 2007; Hovrud et al., 2020) to achieve statistical power.…”
Objective
Research and theory suggest the aetiological nature and symptomatic profile of eating disorders (EDs) can be explained by multiple factors, including the development of early maladaptive schemas (EMS). Yet, there is lack of consensus regarding the evidence supporting the relationship between EMS and EDs. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine existing literature concerning the relationship between different ED diagnoses and EMS to provide a synthesis and evaluation of relevant research.
Method
A comprehensive literature search of four electronic databases was conducted and studies were included that examined the association between EMS and EDs. Studies were required to use a variant of Young Schema Questionnaire and establish ED diagnosis or symptomology using self‐report questionnaires or clinical interview.
Results
A total of 29 studies were included in the review. Compared to healthy controls and varying clinical populations, individuals with EDs generally reported significantly higher scores across all EMS except for Entitlement. Furthermore, Unrelenting Standards consistently appeared as a significant EMS across all ED diagnoses whilst Insufficient Self‐Control was significantly lower in ED diagnoses with restrictive behaviour compared to diagnoses with binge eating or purging behaviour.
Discussion
Research supports significant associations between EMS and EDs, which may contribute to our understanding of ED aetiology, including different diagnostic categories. This review underscores the need for studies to explore more gender and age diverse samples and highlights important implications for practitioners.
“…Most studies measured all EMS within the relevant YSQ version that was used ( n = 24). However, one study only measured Defectiveness/Shame, Emotional Inhibition, Insufficient Self‐Control and Social Isolation subscales (Hovrud et al., 2020). Two studies only measured EMS within the Disconnection/Rejection domain (Jenkins et al., 2013; De Paoli et al., 2017), one study only measured certain domains (i.e., Exaggerated Vigilance/Inhibition, Disconnection and Impaired Autonomy) and subscales (i.e., Unrelenting Standards, Emotional Inhibition; Legenbauer et al., 2018) and one study only measured Defectiveness, Failure and Unrelenting Standards (Deas et al., 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten studies reported the assumptions of statistical analyses (Deas et al., 2011; Hinrichsen et al., 2004, 2007; Hovrud et al., 2020; Jenkins et al., 2013; Leung et al., 1999, 2000; Meyer et al., 2001; Waller et al., 2001, 2002). One study explicitly stated their assumption testing (Hovrud et al., 2020), whereas the remaining nine studies reported more generally (i.e., data were sufficiently well distributed to allow for the use of parametric analyses; Hinrichsen et al., 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies reported being underpowered in their limitations (Basile et al., 2019; Boone et al., 2013; George et al., 2004; Hinrichsen et al., 2004; Imperatori et al., 2017; Lawson et al., 2008; Legenbauer et al., 2018; Leung & Price, 2007; Leung et al., 1999; Rania et al., 2019). Interestingly, 13 studies did not report any sample size power estimations (Elmquist et al., 2015; Gongora et al., 2004; Hinrichsen et al., 2007; Hovrud et al., 2020; Hughes et al., 2006; Jenkins et al., 2013; Meyer et al., 2001; Pauwels et al., 2018; Sines et al., 2008; Unoka et al., 2007, 2010; Voderholzer et al., 2014; Waller et al., 2001). Only three studies arguably had sufficiently large sample sizes (Elmquist et al., 2015; Hinrichsen et al., 2007; Hovrud et al., 2020) to achieve statistical power.…”
Objective
Research and theory suggest the aetiological nature and symptomatic profile of eating disorders (EDs) can be explained by multiple factors, including the development of early maladaptive schemas (EMS). Yet, there is lack of consensus regarding the evidence supporting the relationship between EMS and EDs. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine existing literature concerning the relationship between different ED diagnoses and EMS to provide a synthesis and evaluation of relevant research.
Method
A comprehensive literature search of four electronic databases was conducted and studies were included that examined the association between EMS and EDs. Studies were required to use a variant of Young Schema Questionnaire and establish ED diagnosis or symptomology using self‐report questionnaires or clinical interview.
Results
A total of 29 studies were included in the review. Compared to healthy controls and varying clinical populations, individuals with EDs generally reported significantly higher scores across all EMS except for Entitlement. Furthermore, Unrelenting Standards consistently appeared as a significant EMS across all ED diagnoses whilst Insufficient Self‐Control was significantly lower in ED diagnoses with restrictive behaviour compared to diagnoses with binge eating or purging behaviour.
Discussion
Research supports significant associations between EMS and EDs, which may contribute to our understanding of ED aetiology, including different diagnostic categories. This review underscores the need for studies to explore more gender and age diverse samples and highlights important implications for practitioners.
“…Толерантность к стрессу опосредует ассоциации между конкретными схемами социальной изоляции и недостаточным самоконтролем, и риском расстройства пищевого поведения. Эти результаты предоставляют предварительные доказательства того, что определенные когнитивные схемы могут способствовать снижению толерантности к стрессу, что увеличивает риск развития нарушений пищевого поведения [8].…”
В статье рассматривается влияние стрессовых факторов и толерантности к стрессу на формирование расстройств пищевого поведения на основе анализа современных отечественных и зарубежных исследований. Расстройства пищевого поведения (включая нервную анорексию и булимию, пищевые аддикции) проявляются в подкрепляющей функции еды в ситуации переедания или голодания. На формирование пищевой аддикции оказывают влияние биологические, социальные и психологические факторы. Пищевая аддикция может быть рассмотрена как дезадаптивная стратегия разрешения конфликтов. Толерантность к стрессу (стресс-толерантность, стрессоустойчивость) представляет собой способность человека совладать со стрессогенными факторами. Стрессоустойчивость проявляется как способность к социальной адаптации и активности в ситуации стресса. Для людей с расстройствами пищевого поведения характерны затруднения в регулировании эмоционального состояния, преобладание копинг-стратегии избегания, дефицит стратегии разрешения проблем, неспособность принимать социальную поддержку и использование неадаптивных когнитивных схем.Ключевые слова: нарушение пищевого поведения, пищевая аддикция, стресс, совладающее поведение.
“…Las consecuencias de una mala alimentación también afectan directamente a la autoestima de los jóvenes, los cuales, además, tienen que lidiar con los estereotipos corporales generados por el grupo de amigos o la propia sociedad (Hovrud, Simons, & Simons, 2019). Esta última, junto con las tendencias de moda que imperan desde hace años, influyen en gran medida en la actitud de los jóvenes, los cuales siguen dietas muy estrictas con tal de cumplir con los estereotipos que imperan.…”
Ya desde la época de la antigua Roma se afirmaba que el ejercicio físico, sumado a una buena alimentación, eran la clave para el bienestar mental. Aunque a día de hoy la premisa sigue siendo válida, muchos jóvenes parecen no tenerlo claro, pues el sobrepeso es un problema de salud pública en este subgrupo poblacional. El objetivo es conocer los hábitos alimentarios de la población universitaria, viendo cómo estos se relacionan con su bienestar corporal y emocional. Se hipotetiza que quienes tengan peores hábitos alimentarios padecerán un mayor malestar con su imagen corporal, de la misma forma que su bienestar mental se verá mermado. La muestra está formada por un total de 600 sujetos universitarios(300 mujeresy 300 hombres). Los participantes rellenaron el Cuestionario de Estilo de Vida y Salud (Giménez-García Ballester-Arnal, 2017), escogiendo para este trabajo aquellos ítems relacionados con la alimentación, la imagen corporal y la salud mental. Aquellas personas que cuidan más su alimentación gozan de una mayor satisfacción con su cuerpo ( 2=45.86; p.001). Al mismo tiempo, los jóvenes que están más orgullosos de la imagen corporal reportan un mayor bienestar emocional ( 2=35.02; p.001). Aquellas personas que se autodefinen como gruesas reportan peor salud mental que las delgadas o las que tienen un peso dentro de los parámetros de la normalidad ( 2=17.26; p= .002), llegando a cuidar significativamente menos su alimentación ( 2=23.34; p.001). El bienestar emocional, la imagen corporal y el cuidado de la alimentación están estrechamente relacionados. Una dieta equilibrada no solo mejora la salud física, sino que también incrementa la salud mental. Desde los ámbitos de la salud y la educación se ha de concienciar a los jóvenes para mejorar la alimentación. De esta forma se mejorará tanto la satisfacción corporal como su bienestar emocional.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.