Cognitive reappraisal reduces the susceptibility to the framing effect in economic decision making

Miu, Andrei C.; Crişan, Liviu G.

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.020

Cited by 64 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Compared with reappraisal, experimentally induced suppression decreased risk taking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (Heilman et al, 2010) and increased susceptibility to framing effects in risky choices (Miu & Cris ßan, 2011). Most relevant to our research, Panno et al (2013) directly related the habitual use of suppression to risk taking and found that the former also negatively predicted the latter in the Columbia Card Task.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 66%

Expressive suppression and financial risk taking: A mediated moderation model

Sang

Zhang

2015

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 66%

Expressive suppression and financial risk taking: A mediated moderation model

Sang

Zhang

2015

Personality and Individual Differences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This is further supported by the observation that amygdala resting‐state metabolic activity positively correlated with OFC resting‐state metabolic activity in healthy subjects, which may reveal an important functional relationship between these structures; this effect was absent in borderline personality disorder patients, known for emotional dysregulation (Katz et al, ; New et al, ). In light of these findings, individuals with higher OFC–amygdala functional connectivity may have enhanced emotion regulation during decision‐making under different frames, which in turn reduces the influence of emotional biases on choices and enables resistance to the framing effect (Miu and Crişan, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Normal individuals showed stronger skin conductance responses (SCRs), reflecting emotional activity, to options in the loss frame than to the same options in the gain frame; however, this effect was absent for patients with autism, known for their impairment in emotional processing (De Martino et al, 2008;Hill et al, 2004). The involvement of emotion in the framing effect was further supported by behavioral studies demonstrating that increased distress leads to an increased framing effect (Druckman and McDermott, 2008), while cognitive reappraisal reduces the susceptibility to framing by effectively regulating the emotions associated with the decision frames (Miu and Crişan, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COMT Val158Met polymorphism influences the susceptibility to framing in decision‐making: OFC‐amygdala functional connectivity as a mediator

Gao

Gong

Liu

et al. 2016

Human Brain Mapping

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Individuals tend to avoid risk in a gain frame, in which options are presented in a positive way, but seek risk in a loss frame, in which the same options are presented negatively. Previous studies suggest that emotional responses play a critical role in this "framing effect." Given that the Met allele of COMT Val158Met polymorphism (rs4680) is associated with the negativity bias during emotional processing, this study investigated whether this polymorphism is associated with individual susceptibility to framing and which brain areas mediate this gene-behavior association. Participants were genotyped, scanned in resting state, and completed a monetary gambling task with options (sure vs risky) presented as potential gains or losses. The Met allele carriers showed a greater framing effect than the Val/Val homozygotes as the former gambled more than the latter in the loss frame. Moreover, the gene-behavior association was mediated by resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) between orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and bilateral amygdala. Met allele carriers showed decreased RSFC, thereby demonstrating higher susceptibility to framing than Val allele carriers. These findings demonstrate the involvement of COMT Val158Met polymorphism in the framing effect in decision-making and suggest RSFC between OFC and amygdala as a neural mediator underlying this gene-behavior association. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1880-1892, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

“…A similar study documented that individuals who engaged in a decision task with an analytic/systematic, as opposed to a holistic/heuristic processing style, were insensitive to the influence of framing effects (McElroy & Seta, ). Miu and Crisan () also reported that cognitive reappraisal reduced the susceptibility to the framing effect.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

The Impact of Trait Anxiety on Self‐frame and Decision Making

Peng

Xiao

Yang

et al. 2013

Behavioral Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study investigated how trait anxiety influenced the formation of a self-frame and decision making. Participants (N = 1044) responded to the Trait Anxiety Inventory. Those with trait anxiety scores AE1 Z score from the sample mean (N = 328) were recalled to respond to the self-frame questionnaire. The results suggested that trait anxiety differences could result in differences in the editing of decision-making information, thereby influencing the risky choice. Compared with the low trait anxiety group, participants from the high trait anxiety group showed a greater tendency to use negative vocabulary to construct their self-frame and tended to choose conservative plans. Self-frame suppressed the influence of trait anxiety on decision making. These results further confirmed the hypothesis that individual differences in personality traits might influence the processing of information in a framed decision task.

show abstract

Cognitive reappraisal reduces the susceptibility to the framing effect in economic decision making

Cited by 64 publications

References 27 publications

Expressive suppression and financial risk taking: A mediated moderation model

Expressive suppression and financial risk taking: A mediated moderation model

COMT Val158Met polymorphism influences the susceptibility to framing in decision‐making: OFC‐amygdala functional connectivity as a mediator

The Impact of Trait Anxiety on Self‐frame and Decision Making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About