2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Reactivity, Implicit Associations, and the Incidence of Depression: A Two-Year Prospective Study

Abstract: BackgroundCognitive reactivity to sad mood is a vulnerability marker of depression. Implicit self-depressed associations are related to depression status and reduced remission probability. It is unknown whether these cognitive vulnerabilities precede the first onset of depression.AimTo test the predictive value of cognitive reactivity and implicit self-depressed associations for the incidence of depressive disorders.MethodsProspective cohort study of 834 never-depressed individuals, followed over a two-year pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(57 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive reactivity has been established as a vulnerability factor of depression in prior studies. In a prospective analysis of the NESDA sample, we found that higher cognitive reactivity predicted the onset of depression in a healthy group (Kruijt et al, 2013). Furthermore, higher cognitive reactivity measured with the LEIDS-R was also found to be a predictor of relapse in a longitudinal study, with the rumination subscale being the best predictor (Figueroa et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cognitive reactivity has been established as a vulnerability factor of depression in prior studies. In a prospective analysis of the NESDA sample, we found that higher cognitive reactivity predicted the onset of depression in a healthy group (Kruijt et al, 2013). Furthermore, higher cognitive reactivity measured with the LEIDS-R was also found to be a predictor of relapse in a longitudinal study, with the rumination subscale being the best predictor (Figueroa et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This is not contrary to expectation, since the questionnaire (the LEIDS-R) is addressed to participants who are not in the middle of a depressive episode, since they have to imagine themselves to be "somewhat sad" and how they would react cognitively to this mild sad mood. We have previously shown that the scale is able to capture vulnerability to depression in healthy participants and to predict prospectively the onset of depression (Kruijt et al, 2013).…”
Section: Effect Of IV On M (A) Effect Of M On Dv (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Supporting its validity as a measure of CR, the LEIDS had strong predictive value for CR, as measured with a mood induction procedure (van der Does, 2002). CR as indexed by the LEIDS-R was found to be associated with an increase in depressive symptoms over a one year period (Struijs et al, 2013) and emphasizing its relevance as a premorbid risk factor it was also found to be predictive for the first onset of depression (Kruijt et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…CR (as indexed by the LEIDS-R) has been shown to predict first onsets of depression, whereas self-depressed associations (IAT scores) did not predict first onsets after statistically partialling out the level of depressive symptoms and negative life events (Kruijt et al, 2013). High CR may also increase the risk of recurrence of depression and two studies using mood induction procedures have shown CR to be a significant predictor of recurrence over periods of 15 and 18 months after remission (Segal et al, 2006;Kuyken et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%