2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive profiles of three clusters of patients with a first-episode psychosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cluster analysis is an explorative, hypothesis‐generating and data driven approach. Thus, analogous to previous studies in the psychosis field, replication studies are required in other well‐defined AN samples of different illness severity (e.g., in‐patients) or stage (e.g., adolescents, or recovered samples), in other ED populations (e.g., bulimia nervosa) and in high risk samples (e.g., offspring of mothers with AN) and in trans‐diagnostic ED samples to assess the robustness and specificity of the cluster solutions found here. Moreover, future studies should examine a broad range of collateral validators (neurobiological, developmental, or clinical) to further assess the meaning of our cluster findings and assess their potential utility in characterizing etiological heterogeneity, predicting longer term outcomes or guiding individual tailoring of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cluster analysis is an explorative, hypothesis‐generating and data driven approach. Thus, analogous to previous studies in the psychosis field, replication studies are required in other well‐defined AN samples of different illness severity (e.g., in‐patients) or stage (e.g., adolescents, or recovered samples), in other ED populations (e.g., bulimia nervosa) and in high risk samples (e.g., offspring of mothers with AN) and in trans‐diagnostic ED samples to assess the robustness and specificity of the cluster solutions found here. Moreover, future studies should examine a broad range of collateral validators (neurobiological, developmental, or clinical) to further assess the meaning of our cluster findings and assess their potential utility in characterizing etiological heterogeneity, predicting longer term outcomes or guiding individual tailoring of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This work has suggested that meaningful replicable clusters emerge with associated differences in clinical symptoms, community functioning, treatment response and outcomes. [25][26][27] Analogously, we hypothesize that there will be an ASD-like cluster showing both neuro-and socialcognitive impairment, and that this cluster will have a more severe and chronic form of the illness, together with greater past service utilization and better current treatment adherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings therefore indicate that the development of each dimension of full-blown psychosis is already differentially programmed from the prodromal phase. Future research should be directed at studying whether or not identified specific groups of FEP (Ochoa et al, 2013) stage-appropriate treatments should be developed, taking into account the heterogeneity of symptoms prior to the first manifestations of illness and aimed at ameliorating the distress caused by these symptoms (Carpenter, 2009). The focus of interventions in high-risk patients needs to be broadened with regard to outcomes and intervention approaches, as recommended by the EPA .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…101,102 In addition, poor cognitive impairment cluster(s) were predicted by age, gender, non-Caucasian ethnicity, low socioeconomic and educational status, poor premorbid adjustment, low premorbid and current IQ, early age of illness onset, long duration of illness, severe positive and negative symptoms, poor social cognition, high antipsychotics dosage, use of second generation antipsychotics, and poor functioning and poor quality of life. 32,37,65,66,[79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96] Siblings subgroups with impaired neurocognitive function were predicted by young age, low educational status, low IQ, poor premorbid adjustment, and severe positive schizotypy (Figure 4). 66 Figure 4: Schizophrenia spectrum circle illustrating predictors of symptomatic clusters.…”
Section: Predictors Of Symptomatic Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%