1996
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2502_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive processing in children: Relation to anxiety and family influences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
168
3
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
17
168
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, several lines of previous studies indicate that anxious children have an interpretation bias for ambiguous information, leading them to interpret ambiguous stimuli as threatening (Taghavi, Moradi, Neshat-Doost, Yule, and Dalgleish, 2000). Also, anxious children tend to interpret ambiguous scenarios as threatening and to suggest avoidant responses (Chorpita, Albano and Barlow, 1996). Another study on individual differences in children explored associations between verbal irony comprehension and shyness (Mewhort-Buist and Nielsen, 2012) and reported that shyer children ascribed a greater degree of negative attitude to speakers who made ironic criticisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several lines of previous studies indicate that anxious children have an interpretation bias for ambiguous information, leading them to interpret ambiguous stimuli as threatening (Taghavi, Moradi, Neshat-Doost, Yule, and Dalgleish, 2000). Also, anxious children tend to interpret ambiguous scenarios as threatening and to suggest avoidant responses (Chorpita, Albano and Barlow, 1996). Another study on individual differences in children explored associations between verbal irony comprehension and shyness (Mewhort-Buist and Nielsen, 2012) and reported that shyer children ascribed a greater degree of negative attitude to speakers who made ironic criticisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One cognitive process that has been studied in relation to anxiety in the typically developing population is interpretation bias, which refers to the tendency for anxious individuals to interpret ambiguous stimuli in a threat-related way (Chorpita, Albano, & Barlow, 1996;Hadwin, Frost, French, & Richards, 1997;Muris, Rapee, Meesters, Shouten, & Geers, 2003). This is predominantly assessed using one of two methods: by examining how participants interpret words that have a threat-related and a neutral meaning (homophones such as 'dye'/'die' or homographs such as 'stroke'); or by asking participants what they would think was happening in ambiguous situations such as 'you're lying in bed at night when you hear a big crash in the house'.…”
Section: Interpretation Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…genetically predisposed) (Henin & Kendall, 1997). In addition, parents who reinforce threat interpretations may exacerbate OCD symptoms (Barrett, Rapee, Dadds, & Ryan, 1996;Chorpita, Albano, & Barlow, 1996). Krohne (1990) presented a two-stage model of anxiety development, focusing on child-rearing behaviours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%