2017
DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000000385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Performance Under Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in ECT-Naive Treatment-Resistant Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Abstract: Although findings that ECT does not lead to longer lasting cognitive deficits caused by ECT were confirmed, our study adds evidence that previous results of a beneficial effect of ECT on cognition might be questioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For delayed verbal recall, the overall lack of significant change between baseline and 4-month follow-up also masked an improvement in remitters compared with no change in those still depressed. Previous studies predominantly report no overall improvement in anterograde verbal memory in the months after ECT similar to our results (Bosboom & Deijen, 2006 ; Mohn & Rund, 2016 ; Nuninga et al, 2018 ; Vasavada et al, 2017 ; Verwijk et al, 2014 ; Ziegelmayer et al, 2017 ), with one study finding an improvement (Bodnar et al, 2016 ), and another an improvement on one test and not in another (Obbels et al, 2018 ). Four studies examined a potential influence of mood and found no effect in contrast to our findings (Bosboom & Deijen, 2006 ; Nuninga et al, 2018 ; Vasavada et al, 2017 ; Ziegelmayer et al, 2017 ), but small sample sizes mean they lacked statistical power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For delayed verbal recall, the overall lack of significant change between baseline and 4-month follow-up also masked an improvement in remitters compared with no change in those still depressed. Previous studies predominantly report no overall improvement in anterograde verbal memory in the months after ECT similar to our results (Bosboom & Deijen, 2006 ; Mohn & Rund, 2016 ; Nuninga et al, 2018 ; Vasavada et al, 2017 ; Verwijk et al, 2014 ; Ziegelmayer et al, 2017 ), with one study finding an improvement (Bodnar et al, 2016 ), and another an improvement on one test and not in another (Obbels et al, 2018 ). Four studies examined a potential influence of mood and found no effect in contrast to our findings (Bosboom & Deijen, 2006 ; Nuninga et al, 2018 ; Vasavada et al, 2017 ; Ziegelmayer et al, 2017 ), but small sample sizes mean they lacked statistical power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A systematic review found that the performance on many objective neuropsychological tests is transiently impaired by ECT but improves to baseline or better within a few weeks after completing treatment (Semkovska & McLoughlin, 2010 ). More recent follow-up studies of assessing cognition a few months after ECT have also been consistent in finding no evidence of worsening, with some domains improving, compared with before ECT although the results conflict about which aspects of cognition show improvement (Bodnar et al, 2016 ; Bosboom & Deijen, 2006 ; Mohn & Rund, 2016 ; Nuninga et al, 2018 ; Obbels et al, 2018 ; Vasavada et al, 2017 ; Verwijk et al, 2014 ; Ziegelmayer et al, 2017 ). A remaining area of uncertainty however is whether or not past memories, especially autobiographical memory, might be adversely affected by ECT given the lack of evidence (Semkovska & McLoughlin, 2010 ) and methodological difficulties in the current assessment tools (Semkovska & McLoughlin, 2013 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At no point was there any deterioration of cognitive function compared to baseline. These findings correspond to those from other groups using different cognitive test batteries or with shorter follow-up intervals (Bodnar et al, 2016;Maric et al, 2016;Obbels et al, 2018;Semkowska and McLoughlin, 2010;Verwijk et al, 2012;Ziegelmayer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For example, as shown in Table 4, on the VAT A, one patient (7%) performed significantly worse, 11 patients (73%) remained stable and 3 (20%) patients performed significantly better. Several authors, although investigating individual differences during a shorter follow-up period (until 6 months post-ECT), have reported similar findings [23,[47][48][49]. At present, we know little about why some patients' cognitive function will improve and others' will decline after ECT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%