1997
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Neuropsychological Analysis and Neuroanatomic Correlates in a Case of Acute Anomia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with the observations that different kinds of anomia are associated with disruption of different brain areas (DeLeon et al, 2007;Hillis et al, 2001;Raymer et al, 1997), we demonstrated that the time course of brain activity during impaired picture naming reflects the disrupted process underlying different anomic behaviors. Divergent electrocortical processing starting after 100 msec appeared in patients having a lexical-semantic impairment, indicating impairment in the processes preceding word form encoding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Along with the observations that different kinds of anomia are associated with disruption of different brain areas (DeLeon et al, 2007;Hillis et al, 2001;Raymer et al, 1997), we demonstrated that the time course of brain activity during impaired picture naming reflects the disrupted process underlying different anomic behaviors. Divergent electrocortical processing starting after 100 msec appeared in patients having a lexical-semantic impairment, indicating impairment in the processes preceding word form encoding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…the stimuli in the present experiment were detailed colored objects and repeated items were presented multiple times before the critical test trial, but participants performed the same orienting task (size judgments) for the objects on each presentation; in contrast, the stimuli in the divided visual field study were black and white line drawings, participants performed a different task during the initial exposure than during the test trial (one of three different orienting tasks vs. confrontation naming on the test trial), and objects at test were presented either to the right or left visual field for only 17 ms each.] naming or tagging stimuli that are recognizable [[6]; also see [45]]. Consistent with this possibility, recent PET evidence [42] indicates that patients with semantic dementia, who show especially pronounced difficulties in naming, demonstrate less activation in this region (coordinates of −54, − 52, −10) than do normal controls during semantic comparison tasks involving both pictures and words.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These studies have shown that the behavioral priming that results from repeated exposure to a stimulus also is associated with indications of enhanced 'neural efficiency': some of the brain regions initially involved in the processing of a stimulus show reduced activity during repeated processing of the stimulus. Reductions in neural activity for repeated compared to novel stimuli have been observed in several regions of left frontal cortex that are believed to be involved in accessing or evaluating semantic or phonological representations (Brodmann areas 47,45,44) [10,16,20,44]. Similar reductions have been observed in several posterior cortical regions involved in perceptual or form recognition, including occipitotemporal and occipital cortices [ [8,9,40,55,58]; for review see [54,70]].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A few studies of acute or subacute stroke have indicated that lesions or hypoperfusion of left BA 37 is associated with impaired naming without comprehension deficits (Raymer et al, 1997;Foundas et al, 1998), but these studies have not evaluated the possibility that other regions are also essential for naming. Functional imaging studies often show activation of left BA 37 in modality-independent lexical processing (Price et al, 2003;Tranel et al, 2005), indicating that this area may be recruited in a variety of lexical tasks, including naming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%