Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process

Abstract

We outline the rationale and preliminary results of using the State Context Property (SCOP) formalism, originally developed as a generalization of quantum mechanics, to describe the contextual manner in which concepts are evoked, used, and combined to generate meaning. The quantum formalism was developed to cope with problems arising in the description of (1) the measurement process, and (2) the generation of new states with new properties when particles become entangled. Similar problems arising with concepts motivated the formal treatment introduced here. Concepts are viewed not as fixed representations, but entities existing in states of potentiality that require interaction with a context-a stimulus or another concept-to 'collapse' to an instantiated form (e.g. exemplar, prototype, or other possibly imaginary instance). The stimulus situation plays the role of the measurement in physics, acting as context that induces a change of the cognitive state from superposition state to collapsed state. The collapsed state is more likely to consist of a conjunction of concepts for associative than analytic thought because more stimulus or concept properties take part in the collapse. We provide two contextual measures of conceptual distance-one using collapse probabilities and the other weighted properties-and show how they can be applied to conjunctions using the pet fish problem.

A Modular Approach to Promote Creativity and Inspiration in Search

“…Lee et al have investigated the relationship between creative and information seeking processes more closely and coined the term "creative information seeking" [28,29]. Combining models describing the creative process [19] and information seeking behaviour [14], they propose a six-stage model, where individual stages can be combined depending on the complexity of the search task [29]. Expanding on this idea of creativity as a characteristic and driver of information seeking activities [32], we aim at defining micro-strategies as modules of search processes that, through interface design, can be supported and combined in versatile ways and enable opportunities for learning, creativity, and ideation.…”

Teaching Creativity and Inventive Problem Solving in Science

“…Guilford defined divergent thinking as the ability to produce a broad range of associations to a given stimulus or to arrive at many solutions to a problem (for overviews of the field from different perspectives, see Amabile, 1996;Banaji et al, 2006;Sawyer, 2006). In neurocognitive terms, divergent thinking is referred to as associative richness (Gabora, 2002;Simonton, 2004), which is often measured experimentally by comparing the number of words that an individual generates from memory in response to stimulus words on a word association test. In contrast, convergent thinking refers to the capacity to quickly focus on the one best solution to a problem.…”

Designing creative artificial systems

“…In this context, a problem is defined as a lack of knowledge to transform a system' s specific state to some desired state (Thomas et al, 2002). Through communication, observation, and sub-processes such as recall of earlier experiences, analysis, and association (Gabora, 2002;Gero & Kannengiesser, 2002;Santanen et al, 2002), new knowledge can be generated that enables the mismatch to be solved.…”