2020
DOI: 10.1126/science.aax6904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive map–based navigation in wild bats revealed by a new high-throughput tracking system

Abstract: Seven decades of research on the “cognitive map,” the allocentric representation of space, have yielded key neurobiological insights, yet field evidence from free-ranging wild animals is still lacking. Using a system capable of tracking dozens of animals simultaneously at high accuracy and resolution, we assembled a large dataset of 172 foraging Egyptian fruit bats comprising >18 million localizations collected over 3449 bat-nights across 4 years. Detailed track analysis, combined with translocation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
165
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental affordances are, thus, often horizontally stratified either due to limitations on movement or resources and thus the anisotropic perception and coding of space observed in rats (Hayman et al 2011;Grieves et al 2020) may extend to many other animals even if they live in volumetric substrates. Interestingly, research on Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) suggests that their representation of space is isotropic (equally accurate in all 3 dimensions; Yartsev and Ulanovsky 2013) although this was observed in relatively small rooms compared to the extensive home range of wild fruit bats (Tsoar et al 2011;Harten et al 2020;Toledo et al 2020). It remains to be seen if bats represent the vast areas over which they forage (up to 90 km 2 but with a mean flight altitude of just 30 m; Harten et al (2020) supplementary data) isotropically as well.…”
Section: Horizontal Movement Bias In Both Lattice Mazesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental affordances are, thus, often horizontally stratified either due to limitations on movement or resources and thus the anisotropic perception and coding of space observed in rats (Hayman et al 2011;Grieves et al 2020) may extend to many other animals even if they live in volumetric substrates. Interestingly, research on Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus) suggests that their representation of space is isotropic (equally accurate in all 3 dimensions; Yartsev and Ulanovsky 2013) although this was observed in relatively small rooms compared to the extensive home range of wild fruit bats (Tsoar et al 2011;Harten et al 2020;Toledo et al 2020). It remains to be seen if bats represent the vast areas over which they forage (up to 90 km 2 but with a mean flight altitude of just 30 m; Harten et al (2020) supplementary data) isotropically as well.…”
Section: Horizontal Movement Bias In Both Lattice Mazesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of scales of space is actively considered in human spatial cognition (e.g., Wolbers & Wiener, 2014;Meilinger, 2008;Montello, 1993) and in ecological studies of animals such as rats (e.g., rats live in large, underground tunnels: Calhoun, 1963; rats move an average of over 675 m per night when searching for a new home: Russell, McMorland, & MacKay, 2010), bats (e.g., up to 100 km: Harten, Katz, Goldshtein, Handel, & Yovel, 2020;Toledo et al, 2020;Tsoar et al, 2011), ants (e.g., Wehner, 2020;Wittlinger et al, 2006), andhoneybees (e.g., von Frisch, 1954). For example, one important consideration about the scales of space is whether we and other animals form globally coherent spatial representations of large-scale spaces (e.g., Wolbers & Wiener, 2014;Meilinger, 2008;Hirtle & Jonides, 1985).…”
Section: The Importance Of Scales Of Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present a fully worked-out example of our pre-processing pipeline and residence patch method using movement data from three Egyptian fruit bats tracked using the ATLAS system (Rousettus aegyptiacus; Toledo et al (2020) = 2,173; range = 11,195 -15,542; interval = 8 seconds) per individual. Plotting the tracks showed severe distortions (see Supplementary Material Fig.…”
Section: Worked-out Example On Animal Tracking Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating fine-scale environmental and social drivers and the consequences of movement requires position data from many individuals at high temporal and spatial resolution. Such high-throughput tracking is possible using GPS tags (see recent examples in Harel et al, 2016;Papageorgiou et al, 2019;Strandburg-Peshkin et al, 2015), yet 'reverse-GPS' systems developed to track animals over land (MacCurdy et al, 2009(MacCurdy et al, , 2019Toledo et al, 2014Toledo et al, , 2016Toledo et al, , 2020Weiser et al, 2016) and in aquatic systems (Baktoft et al, 2019(Baktoft et al, , 2017Hussey et al, 2015;Jung et al, 2015) routinely produce high-throughput tracking data at much lower costs. Although high-resolution tracking inherently provides more detailed information about the true path of the tracked animal, high-throughput data presents a two-fold challenge to ecologists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation