2012
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review

Abstract: We identified a wide range of possible approaches to reduce cognitive errors in diagnosis. Not all the suggestions have been tested, and of those that have, the evaluations typically involved trainees in artificial settings, making it difficult to extrapolate the results to actual practice. Future progress in this area will require methodological refinements in outcome evaluation and rigorously evaluating interventions already suggested, many of which are well conceptualised and widely endorsed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
283
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
1
283
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Contributors to diagnostic error include gaps in provider knowledge or memory (e.g., the ability to recall a similar case), mistakes in judgment, fatigue, poor referral choices, incomplete history-taking, misinterpretation of laboratory tests, and provider overconfidence [36,[38][39][40][41][42]. Cognitive [43] and system-related interventions [44] to reduce the likelihood of diagnostic errors have also been examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributors to diagnostic error include gaps in provider knowledge or memory (e.g., the ability to recall a similar case), mistakes in judgment, fatigue, poor referral choices, incomplete history-taking, misinterpretation of laboratory tests, and provider overconfidence [36,[38][39][40][41][42]. Cognitive [43] and system-related interventions [44] to reduce the likelihood of diagnostic errors have also been examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflection is linked to elements that are fundamental to meaningful learning and cognitive development. 13 Reflective practice assures development of Metacognition amongst the students. Metacognition is capacity of the students to improve their ability to think about their thinking; ability to self-evaluate; the capacity for students to judge the quality of their work based on evidence and explicit criteria for doing better work; development of critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making; and an enhancement of teacher understanding of the learner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narrative and systematic reviews have focused on cognitive [40], system [41], and organizational [42] approaches. One review identified 109 strategies that targeted diagnostic error, sorting them into six organizational categories: personnel changes, educational interventions, technique (e.g.…”
Section: Strategies and Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%