2018 Tenth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icoac44903.2018.8939091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Intelligent Transportation System for Smart Cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deriving an approximate value of h(n) takes less time than obtaining the exact value. The approximate value of h(n) can be obtained by any of the three ways such as, Manhattan distance, Euclidean distance and diagonal distance [27] which are expressed in equations ( 4), ( 5) and (6).…”
Section: ) Uav-to-controller Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving an approximate value of h(n) takes less time than obtaining the exact value. The approximate value of h(n) can be obtained by any of the three ways such as, Manhattan distance, Euclidean distance and diagonal distance [27] which are expressed in equations ( 4), ( 5) and (6).…”
Section: ) Uav-to-controller Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marais et al (2014) devised an approach to deal with the inaccuracy of signal propagation conditions for urban users who demand accurate localization by associating GNSS data and imaging information. Raja et al (2018) proposed a cognitive intelligent transportation system (CITS) model that provides efficient channel utilization, which is the key to make any application successful in vehicular ad hoc networks. Zheng et al (2020) used an adaptation evolutionary strategy to control arterial traffic coordination for a better passage rate along one single road with several junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al 7 presented an improved SVR model which performs outstanding accuracy for short‐term traffic flow prediction since optimal parameter combination is obtained faster and better than that in prior works. Raja et al 8 clustered the vehicles at intersection and filtered the redundant message with proposed C‐ITS model, which succeeds in reducing congestion and realizes security services to a certain extent. Boukerche et al 9 summarized both statistics‐based and machine learning‐based models in traffic flow prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%