Decision making was assessed using a laboratory gambling task in 67 adults with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV+) and in 19 HIV-seronegative (HIV−) control participants. Neurocognitive test performance across several domains was also analyzed to examine potential cognitive mechanisms of gambling task performance. As predicted, the HIV+ group performed worse on the gambling task, indicating greater risky decision making. Specifically, the HIV+ group selected more cards from the "risky" or disadvantageous deck that included relatively large payoffs but infrequent large penalties. The control group also selected such risky cards but quickly learned to avoid them. Exploratory analyses also indicated that in the HIV+ group, but not in the control group, gambling task performance was correlated with Stroop Interference performance and long delay free recall on the California Verbal Learning Test, suggesting the role of inhibitory processes and verbal memory in the poorer gambling task performance in HIV. These findings indicate the usefulness of the gambling task as a laboratory tool to examine risky decision making and cognition in the HIV population.
KeywordsHIV; decision making; gambling task; cognition
Risky Decision Making Assessed with the Gambling Task in Adults with HIVFor over two decades, the world has witnessed a devastating epidemic brought on by the HIV. In combating this epidemic, many researchers have grappled with the psychological and social facets of disease proliferation. Particularly over the past decade, infection with HIV has been Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to David J Hardy, University Hall, 1 LMU Drive, Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA 90045-2659. dhardy@lmu.edu.
NIH Public Access
Author ManuscriptNeuropsychology. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 4.
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript found to be associated with risky behaviors, such as unprotected sex, promiscuity, and intravenous drug use (Holmberg, 1996). Furthermore, it has been suggested that risk may be a function of decision-making style. Thus, deci sion-making style is an important area of study both in individuals at risk for HIV infection and in those who are already HIV positive (HIV +). Such knowledge could allow for the development of countermeasures, such as prevention and education programs that target at-risk individuals. For those who are already infected, decisions made take on the greatest salience in areas such as medication adherence, abstinence from substances that might compromise their immune systems, and further unprotected sexual contact.Assessing the degree and type of risky behaviors in persons at risk for or infected with HIV is important. Also relevant is the investigation of the cognitive mechanisms underlying these decisions. Neurocognitive instruments are commonly employed to investigate the cognitive operations underlying observed behavior. One such instrument, referred to as the gambling task (Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, ...