“…Lupyan and Mirman [ 62 ] systematically tested the link between language defect and categorization impairment by comparing categorization performance in APs and in education-matched normal controls on tasks in which the categorization criterion was either “high-dimensional” (i.e., the objects shared many features, such as “farm animals”) or “low-dimensional” (i.e., the objects shared one or a few features, such as “things that are green”). Aphasic patients were selectively impaired on low-dimensional categorization and their selective impairment was correlated with the severity of their naming impairment, indicating, in agreement with the positions of Cohen et al [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ] that language impairment impacts categorization specifically when that it requires focusing attention and isolating individual features of concepts. Consistent with the same hypothesis were also results of a study in which Pauly et al [ 64 ] tested left or right hemisphere stroke patients on a speeded color discrimination task in which two factors were manipulated: (1) the categorical relationship between the target and the distracters and (2) the visual field in which the target was presented.…”