2020
DOI: 10.1111/eip.13110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive functioning in first episode psychosis. Gender differences and relation with clinical variables

Abstract: Aims to study the differences in cognitive functioning in patients and controls. In addition, study the influence of symptoms, cannabis consumption, chlorpromazine doses, DUP and IQ in cognitive performance in patients, both in the total sample and divided by gender. Methods 70 first episode psychosis patients and 63 healthy controls (HC) participated in the study and were assessed with the MATRICS battery and the Vocabulary subtest of WAIS‐IV. Symptoms in FEP patients were evaluated with the Emsley factors of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two main findings emerged from the present study. Firstly, individuals with FEP had higher substance abuse, lower SES, worse psychosocial functioning and neurocognitive performance in all cognitive domains in relation to the HC group ( 27 , 61 ). As expected, individuals with FEP present more difficulties and impairments than the HC group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two main findings emerged from the present study. Firstly, individuals with FEP had higher substance abuse, lower SES, worse psychosocial functioning and neurocognitive performance in all cognitive domains in relation to the HC group ( 27 , 61 ). As expected, individuals with FEP present more difficulties and impairments than the HC group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two others included very few cannabis-users as compared to non-users so the mean difference between both groups could not be adjusted for covariates. 43 , 44 These two datasets were included in a post-hoc sensitivity analysis. Seventeen datasets were thus included in the main analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second sensitivity analysis included the two additional datasets marked as “not used in main analysis” in Table 1 . 43 , 44 Indeed, these two datasets each contained very few cannabis-users (two and six respectively). The linear regression could thus not be adjusted for covariates, introducing potential bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%