2010
DOI: 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181cc0d41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Functioning in Children and Adolescents in Their First Episode of Psychosis

Abstract: To investigate the relationship between cognition and prior cannabis use in children and adolescents presenting a first episode of psychosis. A total of 107 patients with first episode of psychosis and 96 healthy controls, aged 9 to 17 years, were interviewed about their previous substance use and to assess their cognitive functions. Patients were assessed while not using cannabis by means of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. They were divided into 2 groups depending on the history of prior cannabis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies have examined cognitive functioning in a sample who used cannabis before the onset of psychosis. 25,26,33 However, the studies of Stirling et al, 33 Jockers-Scherubl et al, 19 and Schnell et al 20 included a chronic sample, and it was not possible to exclude the effects of cannabis use after the onset of psychosis or illness-related factors. While the studies of de la Serna et al 25 and Mata et al 26 were also FEP samples, they only assessed cannabis use in the previous one month or in the previous 12 months, meaning that their cannabis nonuser samples were likely to have also included patients who had a past history of cannabis use.…”
Section: Summary Of Study Imentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five studies have examined cognitive functioning in a sample who used cannabis before the onset of psychosis. 25,26,33 However, the studies of Stirling et al, 33 Jockers-Scherubl et al, 19 and Schnell et al 20 included a chronic sample, and it was not possible to exclude the effects of cannabis use after the onset of psychosis or illness-related factors. While the studies of de la Serna et al 25 and Mata et al 26 were also FEP samples, they only assessed cannabis use in the previous one month or in the previous 12 months, meaning that their cannabis nonuser samples were likely to have also included patients who had a past history of cannabis use.…”
Section: Summary Of Study Imentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Five of these studies were excluded because: (1) they lacked data for calculating effect size, 22,23 , (2) the study sample included a mixture of patients with schizophrenia and affective disorders, 24 and (3) they were primarily FEP studies (too few studies in this group to conduct appropriate meta-analyses). 25,26 In 6 of the 10 studies included in the meta-analysis, cannabis use was defined as lifetime use and in the other 4 studies it was defined as recent use (current use or use in last 6 months). In 2 of the included studies, 27,28 not all patients in the substance-using groups were abusing cannabis, but they were still included in the meta-analysis since cannabis was the most commonly used substance within the samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first suggests that those psychotic subjects who use cannabis have less premorbid cognitive impairment than those who do not. This could be because good premorbid functioning is necessary to acquire and sustain an illegal drug habit (Joyal et al, 2003;Stirling et al, 2005;RodriguezSanchez et al, 2010) or because cannabis use increases the risk of psychosis in a subgroup of patients with less neurodevelopmental vulnerability (Løberg and Hugdahl, 2009;Schnell et al, 2009;de la Serna et al, 2010;Yücel et al, 2010;Leeson et al, 2012;Schnell et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Verbal memory was measured with the Wechsler Memory Scale -Third Edition (WMS-III), covering logical memory (immediate), logical memory (delayed), and logical memory (recognition) 21 ; for verbal working memory, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) backward digit span test was used. 18 Auditory attention was measured with the WISC-IV digit span test 20 ; processing speed, by digit symbol coding (WISC-IV). 20 Premorbid IQ was measured with the vocabulary subtest of the WISC-IV.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 The neuropsychological battery employed in this study was designed to address the following domains: IQ, verbal memory, verbal working memory, auditory attention, processing speed, premorbid IQ, executive function, and visual memory.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%