1983
DOI: 10.2307/1357938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Function and Women's Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical contribution of the above art feminist practitioners is a testimony to how theoretically informed woman artists drove towards a kind of morphological difference to men's art, which found substance in the specific mimetic quality of the female condition, thus changing the form of art 31 . In their reflections, acting in the art field became neither a question of integration into the patriarchal art world and its male dominated perspective, nor one of creating a safe haven for women to indulge in their traditional dwellings and subject matters, but to change the character of art through a different aesthetic attitude derived from the conditio muliebris that is different from men's, precisely because it feels different to be a woman 32 . In this sense, it can be said that Lippard, EXPORT, and Kelly were coming to terms with the simplistic parallelism between woman and nature, which is partly nurtured by the primitive Mother Nature idealism of patriarchal ascendency which, however, tends to pin down women to their reproductive role and confine them in the sphere of family matters that are not universal, as compared to male experience 33 .…”
Section: Mimetic Exploration Of Bodily Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical contribution of the above art feminist practitioners is a testimony to how theoretically informed woman artists drove towards a kind of morphological difference to men's art, which found substance in the specific mimetic quality of the female condition, thus changing the form of art 31 . In their reflections, acting in the art field became neither a question of integration into the patriarchal art world and its male dominated perspective, nor one of creating a safe haven for women to indulge in their traditional dwellings and subject matters, but to change the character of art through a different aesthetic attitude derived from the conditio muliebris that is different from men's, precisely because it feels different to be a woman 32 . In this sense, it can be said that Lippard, EXPORT, and Kelly were coming to terms with the simplistic parallelism between woman and nature, which is partly nurtured by the primitive Mother Nature idealism of patriarchal ascendency which, however, tends to pin down women to their reproductive role and confine them in the sphere of family matters that are not universal, as compared to male experience 33 .…”
Section: Mimetic Exploration Of Bodily Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%