2008
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2008.11076759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Failures, Driving Errors and Driving Accidents

Abstract: Although the CFQ was not able to predict driving accidents, it could be used to identify drivers susceptible to driving errors. Further development of a driving-oriented cognitive failure scale is recommended to help identify error prone drivers. Such a scale may be beneficial to licensing authorities or for developing driver selection and training procedures for organizations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Reason, Manstead, Stradling, et al also showed a minimum 3-fold lower unsafe driving behavior frequencies [5], but they used a different version of the DBQ questionnare with different subscale that might make comparing the results difficult. In the present study, the mean OCF score was 28.9 and was similar to Allahyari, Saraji, Adl, et al's findings, which showed that the mean score of the CFQ was 27.9 [14]. The mean OCF score in the present study is lower than the mean cognitive failure reported by Wallace and Vodanovich [12], who measured the cognitive failure in relation to driving accidents (the mean score was 43.4) and Matthews, Coyle and Craig [25], who measured the cognitive error in relation to stress (the mean score was 45.0), but greater than the mean cognitive failure score reported by Larson, Alderton, Neideffer, et al [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Reason, Manstead, Stradling, et al also showed a minimum 3-fold lower unsafe driving behavior frequencies [5], but they used a different version of the DBQ questionnare with different subscale that might make comparing the results difficult. In the present study, the mean OCF score was 28.9 and was similar to Allahyari, Saraji, Adl, et al's findings, which showed that the mean score of the CFQ was 27.9 [14]. The mean OCF score in the present study is lower than the mean cognitive failure reported by Wallace and Vodanovich [12], who measured the cognitive failure in relation to driving accidents (the mean score was 43.4) and Matthews, Coyle and Craig [25], who measured the cognitive error in relation to stress (the mean score was 45.0), but greater than the mean cognitive failure score reported by Larson, Alderton, Neideffer, et al [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This finding is in step with Allahyari et al, who showed a significant correlation between the CFQ score and driving error rates measured with the driver error questionnaire [14]. Allahyari et al also concluded that the CFQ score was a significant predictor of driving errors [14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations