Cognitive Factors in Addictive Processes

Neighbors, Clayton; Lindgren, Kristen P.; Rodriguez, Lindsey M.; Tidwell, Judy; Zvorsky, Ivori

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398336-7.00027-9

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…From a cognitivist standpoint, rewards increase the expected value of a given behaviour. It is the subject of some debate whether rewards operate on a nonconscious Type 1 behaviourist level or a conscious Type 2 cognitivist level [Capa et al 2011;Neighbors et al 2013]. Using the HAM model in Figure 1 to illustrate, rewards boost the position of the matching impulse (nonconscious Type 1) or intention (conscious type 2) on the Potential Response stack (P6).…”

Section: Revalue Outcome (A2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits

Pinder

Vermeulen

Cowan

et al. 2018

ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.

135

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital behaviour change interventions, particularly those using pervasive computing technology, hold great promise in supporting users to change their behaviour. However, most interventions fail to take habitual behaviour into account, limiting their potential impact. This failure is partly driven by a plethora of overlapping behaviour change theories and related strategies that do not consider the role of habits. We critically review the main theories and models used in the research to analyse their application to designing effective habitual behaviour change interventions. We highlight the potential for Dual Process Theory, modern habit theory, and Goal Setting Theory, which together model how users form and break habits, to drive effective digital interventions. We synthesise these theories into an explanatory framework, the Habit Alteration Model, and use it to outline the state of the art. We identify the opportunities and challenges of habit-focused interventions.

show abstract

Section: Revalue Outcome (A2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits

Pinder

Vermeulen

Cowan

et al. 2018

ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.

135

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Resolving Sequential Self-Control Dilemmas: The Role of Pride and Guilt

Storch,

Wan,

van Ittersum

2024

Emotion Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extant evidence suggests that the two self-conscious emotions pride and guilt guide people's behavior in the context of self-control dilemmas. Pride and guilt are both outcomes of and antecedents to how people resolve self-control dilemmas. However, evidence on how pride and guilt motivate individuals to exert self-control is inconsistent. Based on the Expectancy Value Theory, we propose a conceptual framework to predict when and how pride and guilt can lead to increased or decreased self-control. One particularly important factor is the relatedness of the past and focal dilemmas: whether pride or guilt arises from a success or failure to exercise self-control in a domain related or unrelated to a focal self-control dilemma may determine people's motivation to exert self-control.

show abstract

Cognitive Factors in Addictive Processes

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits

Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits

Resolving Sequential Self-Control Dilemmas: The Role of Pride and Guilt

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About