Cognitive error as the most frequent contributory factor in cases of medical injury: A study on verdict's judgment among closed claims in Japan

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive errors in the course of clinical decision‐making are prevalent in many cases of medical injury. We used information on verdict's judgment from closed claims files to determine the important cognitive factors associated with cases of medical injury. METHODS: Data were collected from claims closed between 2001 to 2005 at district courts in Tokyo and Osaka, Japan. In each case, we recorded all the contributory cognitive, systemic, and patient‐related factors judged in the verdicts to be causally related to the medical injury. We also analyzed the association between cognitive factors and cases involving paid compensation using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among 274 cases (mean age 49 years old; 45% women), there were 122 (45%) deaths and 67 (24%) major injuries (incomplete recovery within a year). In 103 cases (38%), the verdicts ordered hospitals to pay compensation (median; 8,000,000 Japanese Yen). An error in judgment (199/274, 73%) and failure of vigilance (177/274, 65%) were the most prevalent causative cognitive factors, and error in judgment was also significantly associated with paid compensation (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0‐3.4). Systemic causative factors including poor teamwork (11/274, 4%) and technology failure (5/274, 2%) were less common. CONCLUSIONS: The closed claims analysis based on verdict's judgment showed that cognitive errors were common in cases of medical injury, with an error in judgment being most prevalent and closely associated with compensation payment. Reduction of this type of error is required to produce safer healthcare. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2010. © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Bacterial Contamination of Medical Doctors and Students White Coats at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania

“…The significant number of pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli calls for urgent response and strictness of IPC measures to keep our patients free from nosocomial infections. Our current study showed significant percentage of bacterial contamination of white coats which supported the USA study by Collins and our results were against UK study by Burden et al which concluded that white coats may not be major culprit in the spread of nosocomial infection [ 15 , 16 ]. The existing difference may be explained by the different environment settings, where in the UK the hygienic hospital environment, isolation of infectious diseases from noninfectious ones, less populated hospitals, and organized hospital laundering services may not contribute much to the bacterial contamination of white coats.…”

Factors and impact of physicians’ diagnostic errors in malpractice claims in Japan

“…[6] Diagnostic errors can be studied using several means, including data from: 1) malpractice claims, 2) autopsies, 3) questionnaire surveys, 4) case reviews, 5) hospital incident reports, 6) patient surveys, and 7) secondary reviews. [7] Diagnostic errors are a common reason for malpractice claims, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and claims data could provide vital information from patients' viewpoints. [2,3] For instance, Tokuda and colleagues summarized the findings from 274 malpractice claims filed at two local district courts in Tokyo and Osaka, and found that cognitive errors were the most common errors associated with these medical claims.…”

Clinical Reasoning Web-based Prototypic Module for Tutors Teaching 5^th Grade Medical Students : A Pilot Randomized Study

“…13 In addition a report of Japanese malpractice cases highlighted the need for leaders of medical schools and teaching hospitals to improve their teaching of clinical reasoning skills; the majority of these claims were adjudicated against physicians for their cognitive and judgment errors. 14 To accelerate these improvements, a group of international medical educators developed a demonstration pilot module which is the subject of this report. The goals of this project were: 1) to produce a prototypical module for Japanese medical educators, and by implication, other Asian medical educator, to introduce clinical reasoning to MS entering their clinical clerkships; 2) and to compare the module's usefulness by assessing the change of fifth year Japanese MS tutored by Japanese United States trained general internists, compared to a self-study group.…”