2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive effort during a short-term memory (STM) task in individuals with aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, future studies should use a battery of VSTM tests 40 or additional performance metrics. 55–57 Additionally, while the digit span task used here places minimal demands on attentional mechanisms, future studies should directly evaluate the attention abilities of the patients. We note though that a recent study has shown that while patients with aphasia do exhibit attention impairments, performance on attention tasks did not correlate with performance on the forward digit span task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, future studies should use a battery of VSTM tests 40 or additional performance metrics. 55–57 Additionally, while the digit span task used here places minimal demands on attentional mechanisms, future studies should directly evaluate the attention abilities of the patients. We note though that a recent study has shown that while patients with aphasia do exhibit attention impairments, performance on attention tasks did not correlate with performance on the forward digit span task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides eye movements, pupillometry and task-evoked pupillary responses have been used increasingly over the last decade to study linguistic processing (Chapman & Hallowell, 2015) and cognitive effort (Kim et al, 2018) in PWA. For example, examining pupil size changes can reveal the number of items stored in short-term memory (Johnson et al, 2014), and there is mounting evidence that pupillary responses are valid indicators of task differences in cognitive effort (see overview in Chapman & Hallowell, 2015).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%