2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive efficiency: A conceptual and methodological comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(133 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that a higher order process or set of processes is important for observing both high levels of EC and high levels of math performance. For example, cognitive efficiency , which has also been described as mental, neurological, instructional, learning, or processing efficiency, involves optimal cognitive processing (Hoffman, ), and seems important for both the manifestation of EC skills and achieving in math. The anterior cingulate gyrus system (i.e., the executive attention network), located in the midprefrontal cortex and responsible for attention to spatial and semantic information (Derryberry & Rothbart, ) and abilities to detect errors and plan (Rothbart, ), appears to be the site at which the brain exerts control over information processing and houses information to be processed (Posner & Raichle, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that a higher order process or set of processes is important for observing both high levels of EC and high levels of math performance. For example, cognitive efficiency , which has also been described as mental, neurological, instructional, learning, or processing efficiency, involves optimal cognitive processing (Hoffman, ), and seems important for both the manifestation of EC skills and achieving in math. The anterior cingulate gyrus system (i.e., the executive attention network), located in the midprefrontal cortex and responsible for attention to spatial and semantic information (Derryberry & Rothbart, ) and abilities to detect errors and plan (Rothbart, ), appears to be the site at which the brain exerts control over information processing and houses information to be processed (Posner & Raichle, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to hypothesis testing, we conducted a series of preliminary analyses to test for sex and age differences and for significant relations among study variables. We estimated all models testing hypotheses in Mplus 7.11 (Muth en & Muth en, 1998-2012. Because complete data were not available for all participants across grades, we estimated models using maximum likelihood robust (MLR) in Mplus, which estimates parameters directly via a full information maximum likelihood procedure.…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectiveness refers to the quality of task performance and is typically operationalized as response accuracy. Efficiency is defined as the relationship between accuracy and the resources used to accomplish the task; it can be measured by the ratio of accuracy to response time on correct trials (Hoffman, 2012).…”
Section: Test Anxiety and Cognitive Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy scores were used as measures of performance effectiveness. Following Townsend and Ashby's (1983) approach (see also Hoffman, 2012), accuracy divided by RT (summed across all accurate trials) was used as measures of efficiency; higher scores on the latter indicate increased efficiency.…”
Section: Participants and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was constructed by Paas and Merrienboer (1993) and Tuovinen and Paas (2004). This is a suitable model to measure cognitive efficiency when comparing instructional interventions (Hoffman, 2012). It also chose regarding with its simplicity and easy to interpret.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%