2020
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive dysfunction in Sjögren’s syndrome using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Questionnaire and the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract: Aim: To describe the prevalence of cognitive impairment and the most affected cognitive domains, employing the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) of a Latin American primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) cohort, and compare these patients to secondary Sjögren's syndrome (sSS) subjects and controls. Methods: This was a comparative cross-sectional study of patients with a diagnosis of pSS who fulfilled the American-European Consensus Group 2002 criteria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with literature data 36 , pSS patients presented mainly memory complaints and more than half of them exhibited pathological scores for global memory, executive functions, or instrumental functions. The proportions of patients with impaired executive functions and visuospatial skills are consistent with previous studies 4 , 9 , 10 , 36 . However, our approach, including a wide range of tests and a personalized comprehensive evaluation of each patient, was more sensitive than previous studies, and allowed an early detection of cognitive impairments (borderline scores), and their interpretation with other cofounding factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with literature data 36 , pSS patients presented mainly memory complaints and more than half of them exhibited pathological scores for global memory, executive functions, or instrumental functions. The proportions of patients with impaired executive functions and visuospatial skills are consistent with previous studies 4 , 9 , 10 , 36 . However, our approach, including a wide range of tests and a personalized comprehensive evaluation of each patient, was more sensitive than previous studies, and allowed an early detection of cognitive impairments (borderline scores), and their interpretation with other cofounding factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Most patients report “brain fog” symptoms 2 , described as memory lapses, forgetfulness, mental confusion, diminished ability to concentrate, to organize, or to anticipate future events. The precise neuropsychological pattern of pSS is not fully deciphered, however, executive functions are often abnormal 9 , 10 . The interplay between cognitive complaints, cognitive impairment, fatigue, depression 11 , sleep disorders 12 , and pain is not fully understood in pSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may require an early multidisciplinary approach integrating neurologists and internists which focuses on these complaints and their course. An early screening of cognitive complaints through validated tools (such as the Brief Cognitive Symptoms Inventory (BCSI) or the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCa)) could be used in daily practice [ 28 , 29 ]. In case of abnormalities, a complete neuropsychological work-up could help establish the impaired cognitive functions’ subdomains and how to treat them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic tests to detect sicca symptoms were not performed routinely, as every patient with pSS did not receive an MRI scan or an electrophysiological workup. Morreale et al proposed an association of pSS with headache syndromes and neurocognitive/psychological disorders ( 38 ), and a recent study has focused on cognitive dysfunction and dementia in pSS ( 39 , 40 ), which we did not address either. Moreover, we were not able to recapitulate each individual treatment decision hindering a more systematic analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%