2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2834072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Dissonance, Motivated Reasoning, and Confirmation Bias: Applications in Industrial Organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case there is any dissonance between evidence displayed and prior beliefs, the theory of motivated reasoning states that decision‐makers, guided by directional goals, tend to downplay or disregard the evidence that contradicts their prior beliefs. Motivated reasoning is therefore the link between cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias where decision‐makers actively search for evidence that supports their prior beliefs (Stone and Wood 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case there is any dissonance between evidence displayed and prior beliefs, the theory of motivated reasoning states that decision‐makers, guided by directional goals, tend to downplay or disregard the evidence that contradicts their prior beliefs. Motivated reasoning is therefore the link between cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias where decision‐makers actively search for evidence that supports their prior beliefs (Stone and Wood 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Development Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the authors of one study proposed that participants engaged in motivated reasoning processes when interpreting ambiguous numerical ranges (Dieckmann et al, 2017). Further, cognitive dissonance can elicit motivated reasoning (Stone & Wood, 2018). For example, it is possible that individuals feel cognitive dissonance from receiving conflicting information (i.e., they feel discomfort from conflicting thoughts that vaccines are effective but they are not sure whether a new COVID-19 vaccine will be effective), so they lower their perception of risk as part of motivated reasoning to resolve their cognitive dissonance and justify their avoidance behavior (i.e., "It's unlikely that I will get this illness, and if I do, it won't be that bad, so I do not have to get this vaccine").…”
Section: Effects Of Ambiguous Versus Unambiguous Health Information About Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%