2014
DOI: 10.1017/langcog.2014.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Discourse Analysis: accessing cognitive representations and processes through language data

Abstract: This paper offers the first general introduction to CODA (Cognitive Discourse Analysis), a methodology for analyzing verbal protocols and other types of unconstrained language use, as a resource for researchers interested in mental representations and high-level cognitive processes. CODA can be used to investigate verbalizations of perceived scenes and events, spatio-temporal concepts, complex cognitive processes such as problem-solving and cognitive strategies and heuristics, and other concepts that are acces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second stage of the analysis, firmly grounded in cognitive discourse analysis methodology (Tenbrink, 2015), requires the iterative development of rules to achieve good inter-annotator agreement. The associated need for human annotators and the time-consuming nature of the annotation process can be regarded as a limitation, especially in an era of big data and machine learning.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second stage of the analysis, firmly grounded in cognitive discourse analysis methodology (Tenbrink, 2015), requires the iterative development of rules to achieve good inter-annotator agreement. The associated need for human annotators and the time-consuming nature of the annotation process can be regarded as a limitation, especially in an era of big data and machine learning.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way of accessing thought-related processes is through the analysis of language, since the particular linguistic choices a speaker makes convey the specifics of his or her conceptualization (Tenbrink, 2015). A number of phenomena, such as focus of attention, (switching between) granularity levels, conceptual perspectives, and the like, have been operationalized through linguistic structures and linked to contextual factors such as modes of traveling (Tenbrink & Winter, 2009), spatial experience (Hölscher, Tenbrink & Wiener, 2011), familiarity with a specific route (Lovelace, Hegarty & Montello, 1999), space structure (Brosset, Claramunt & Saux, 2008;Kray et al, 2013), and wayfinding purpose (Hirtle, Timpf, & Tenbrink, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding communicating verbal descriptions, several researchers developed approaches in finding a structure to effectively describe wayfinding instructions (Denis and Zimmer 1992;Allen 1997;Timpf 2002;Klippel 2003;Tenbrink 2014). These instructions could either be based on route knowledge, survey knowledge or a mix of both (Tversky et al 1999).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discourse markers included in analysis were hesitation markers and pauses. The inclusion of these varied hesitation types was based on early research examining word predictability in the context of hesitations (see, Henderson, Goldman-Eisler, & Skarbek, 1965;Tannenbaum, Williams, & Hillier, 1965) and further inspired by the methodology of Cognitive Discourse Analysis (Tenbrink, 2015) which aims at identifying linguistic markers that reflect cognitive processes of various kinds.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%