2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00357-019-09357-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomously Scored Items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is hoped that this development will allow realistic contexts in applied practice to also be explored. The study by Gao et al (2020) has pioneered this [53]. Fourth, there has been recent interest in hybrid selection rules that seek to simultaneously classify a general latent trait score that is continuous and that explains the relationships between discrete attributes modeled in CDM and the attributes (e.g., [30]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hoped that this development will allow realistic contexts in applied practice to also be explored. The study by Gao et al (2020) has pioneered this [53]. Fourth, there has been recent interest in hybrid selection rules that seek to simultaneously classify a general latent trait score that is continuous and that explains the relationships between discrete attributes modeled in CDM and the attributes (e.g., [30]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the dichotomous item response is only often used in multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank items. For polytomous scoring items (Gao et al, 2020 ), the adaptive designs remain to be further studied.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The item with the minimized expected SHE should be chosen as the next item (Tatsuoka, 2002) because it would lead to minimal uncertainty, which allows the estimated attribute profile to better approximate the true attribute profile. Since the SHE method does not rely on the current estimated attribute profile, it is less impacted by the measurement error of the estimated attribute profile (Gao et al, 2020). In addition, several previous studies indicated that the SHE method might slightly outperform the PWKL methods in some conditions (Chang et al, 2019; Chen et al, 2011; Dai et al, 2016; Gao et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Item Selection Methods For Cd-catmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the SHE method does not rely on the current estimated attribute profile, it is less impacted by the measurement error of the estimated attribute profile (Gao et al, 2020). In addition, several previous studies indicated that the SHE method might slightly outperform the PWKL methods in some conditions (Chang et al, 2019; Chen et al, 2011; Dai et al, 2016; Gao et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Item Selection Methods For Cd-catmentioning
confidence: 99%