2016
DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Defusion Predicts More Approach and Less Avoidance Coping With Stress, Independent of Threat and Self‐Efficacy Appraisals

Abstract: Cognitive defusion may be an important individual-difference predictor of coping behavior, adding to established theories of coping such as Lazarus and Folkman's (1987) transactional theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(147 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These social and psychological characteristics may be considered as the determinants of a person's use of adaptive coping ways under challenging situations and more or less serve as a guarantee for their successful overcoming. Besides, the obtained results are consistent with modern studies of cognitive coping strategies as factors of successful coping with stress [32,33]. Since work experience is correlated with age, it can be assumed that in further studies, the relationship of effective coping with age is also not confirmed.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…These social and psychological characteristics may be considered as the determinants of a person's use of adaptive coping ways under challenging situations and more or less serve as a guarantee for their successful overcoming. Besides, the obtained results are consistent with modern studies of cognitive coping strategies as factors of successful coping with stress [32,33]. Since work experience is correlated with age, it can be assumed that in further studies, the relationship of effective coping with age is also not confirmed.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…This process has been described as ‘dereification’ (Condon, ), ‘reperceiving’ (Shapiro, Carlson, Astin, & Freedman, ), and ‘cognitive defusion’ (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, ). In support of this, there is evidence that cognitive defusion predicts less avoidance behaviour when facing suffering, and a greater likelihood of approach behaviours, such as active coping and positive reinterpretation (Donald, Atkins, Parker, Christie, & Guo, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Fourth, mindfulness may enhance affect regulation, meaning that the experience of negative emotions, such as personal distress when faced with the suffering of another, is less likely to inhibit compassionate and behaviourally flexible responses to such situations (Condon, 2017;Donald, Atkins, Parker, Christie, & Ryan, 2016), and individuals are more likely to respond with interpersonal warmth and kindness (Fredrickson, Cohn, Coffey, Pek, & Finkel, 2008) and act in values-consistent ways (Donald, Atkins, Parker, Christie, & Guo, 2016). Consistent with this, reductions in emotional interference (assessed as the delay in reaction time after being presented with affective versus neutral pictures) have been shown to follow mindfulness training (Ortner et al, 2007).…”
Section: Prosocial Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This faciltates defusion, or cognitive distancing, rather than only encountering the world as organized through their thoughts. Cognitive fusion and defusion have been found to help account for, among other clinical problems, approach-avoidance coping with stress (Donald, Atkins, Parker, Christie, & Guo, 2017), psychological coping with inflammatory bowel disease (Trindade et al, 2017), suicidal ideation (Roush, Brown, Mitchell, & Cukrowicz, 2017), depression (Bardeen & Fergus, 2016), and body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders (Ferreira, Palmeira, & Trindade, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%