2005
DOI: 10.1038/nn1594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information

Abstract: A prominent model of how the brain regulates attention proposes that the anterior cingulate cortex monitors the occurrence of conflict between incompatible response tendencies and signals this information to a cognitive control system in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive control is thought to resolve conflict through the attentional biasing of perceptual processing, emphasizing task-relevant stimulus information. It is not known, however, whether conflict resolution is mediated by amplifying neural rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

101
774
14
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 933 publications
(893 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
101
774
14
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive control is a set of flexible and adaptive brain processes, which come into play when we engage in intentional actions, as opposed to unintentional and inflexible automatic brain processes (Egner and Hirsch, 2005). Cognitive tasks designed to explore an individual's cognitive control aim to simultaneously activate automatic and conscious responses to the same stimulus, which depending on the situation may give rise to a conflict in that individual (Cona et al, 2016;Lu and Proctor, 1995).…”
Section: Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive control is a set of flexible and adaptive brain processes, which come into play when we engage in intentional actions, as opposed to unintentional and inflexible automatic brain processes (Egner and Hirsch, 2005). Cognitive tasks designed to explore an individual's cognitive control aim to simultaneously activate automatic and conscious responses to the same stimulus, which depending on the situation may give rise to a conflict in that individual (Cona et al, 2016;Lu and Proctor, 1995).…”
Section: Cognitive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroimaging studies of people performing the Stroop task indicate that cognitive control mechanisms in pre-frontal cortex enhance performance by transiently amplifying cortical responses to relevant information in perceptual areas (Egner and Hirsch, 2005). Though there is still debate over how best to interpret cortical signals recorded during Stroop tasks, such findings suggest that attentional amplification of relevant features may be involved in the cognitive control exerted by prefrontal cortex.…”
Section: Modulation That Amplifies Responses To Rf Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective adaptation of perceptual congruency effects was also demonstrated in the neuroimaging study of Egner and Hirsch (2005). Using a face-word Stroop task, these authors found that the fusiform face area (FFA; i.e., the visual area specialized in face processing) was more activated during incongruent trials following incongruent trials than incongruent trials following congruent trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The perceptual dissimilarity between the prime and target might have caused more interference in this experiment due to the absence of a metacontrast mask. In turn, this higher perceptual conflict in the previous trial might have increased the need for reducing it in the current trial, possibly through a mechanism of attentional amplification to target task-relevant features (Egner & Hirsch, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%