2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0504-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive control in number magnitude processing: evidence from eye-tracking

Abstract: The unit-decade compatibility effect describes longer response times and higher error rates for incompatible (e.g., 37_52) than compatible (e.g., 42_57) number comparisons. Recent research indicated that the effect depends on the percentage of same-decade filler items. In the present study, we further examined this relationship by recording participants' eye-fixation behaviour. In four conditions, participants had to compare item sets with different filler item types (i.e., same-decade and same-unit filler ite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
58
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the similar pattern of results obtained in Experiment 1 and 2 indicates that contextual multiplication problems did not influence the retrieval of multiplication facts when participants resolved addition problems. This finding is particularly odd because it is usually found that when participants are engaged in a number cognition tasks (i.e., number comparison) their performance is modulated by the type and number of filler trials used in the experiment (Huber, Mann, Nuerk, & Moeller, 2014;Macizo & Herrera, 2011. Several explanations might be offered for the lack of contextual effects in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…However, the similar pattern of results obtained in Experiment 1 and 2 indicates that contextual multiplication problems did not influence the retrieval of multiplication facts when participants resolved addition problems. This finding is particularly odd because it is usually found that when participants are engaged in a number cognition tasks (i.e., number comparison) their performance is modulated by the type and number of filler trials used in the experiment (Huber, Mann, Nuerk, & Moeller, 2014;Macizo & Herrera, 2011. Several explanations might be offered for the lack of contextual effects in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Similar to what we have commented in the previous section with the Stroop task, there is recent evidence suggesting that individuals adapt to conflict situations in numerical cognition (Huber, Mann, Nuerk, & Moeller, 2014;Huber, Moeller, Nuerk, Macizo, Herrera, & Willmes, 2013;Macizo & Herrera, 2011aMoeller, Klein, & Nuerk, 2013). Macizo and Herrera (2011a) evaluated whether the compatibility effect was modulated by the relevance of units across the experimental task.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The results showed that the compatibility effect was large when the relevance of units was biased by increasing the percentage of within-decade comparisons (i.e., 46-48, filler trials in the experiment) whose resolution required the processing of units. Huber et al (2014) found converging evidence of contextual effects depending on the proportion of within-decade filler trials. In an eye-tracking study, the authors manipulated the percentage of within-decade fillers (25, 50, and 75 %).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Their results showed that when the unit digits became more relevant than the decade digits (70% same-decade comparisons) the compatibility effect shifted from negative to positive. A recent study by Huber et al (2013) provided the first eye-tracking evidence to indicate that the compatibility effect increases with the percentage of same-decade filler items (i.e., 25%, 50%, and 75%) which was accompanied by less fixations on tens and more fixations on units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recent work indicates that the compatibility effect is influenced by the relevance of the rightmost unit digit processing during the comparison task (Huber, Mann, Nuerk, & Moeller, 2013;Macizo & Herrera, 2011). In their study, Macizo and Herrera (2011) heightened the relevance of unit processing by increasing the percentage (i.e., 20%, 50%, and 70%) of same-decade filler items (e.g., 52_58) in the stimulus set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%