2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive consistency and math–gender stereotypes in Singaporean children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
2
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
90
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…On the most recent TIMSS assessment, the maleefemale difference in average math scores of Singaporean boys and girls in Grade 4 was not measurably different (Provasnik et al, 2012). Contrary to what one might expect given these data, however, Cvencek, Meltzoff, and Kapur (2014) found that: (a) Singaporean elementary-school students hold the mathegender stereotype, and (b) Singaporean boys identify more strongly with math than do girls.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the most recent TIMSS assessment, the maleefemale difference in average math scores of Singaporean boys and girls in Grade 4 was not measurably different (Provasnik et al, 2012). Contrary to what one might expect given these data, however, Cvencek, Meltzoff, and Kapur (2014) found that: (a) Singaporean elementary-school students hold the mathegender stereotype, and (b) Singaporean boys identify more strongly with math than do girls.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…One conjecture is that this societal stereotype about gender influences boys and girls differential identification with math at early ages (Cvencek, Meltzoff, & Greenwald, 2011). Gender stereotypes may potentially mediate learning and performance in specific academic subjects by influencing students' level of anxiety, interest, and effort they put into learning that domain (Beilock, Gunderson, Ramirez, & Levine, 2010;Steffens, Jelenec, & Noack, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the youngest ages so far tested (kindergarten to second grade), North American and European children tend to report either that the genders are equal in ability (Steele, 2003) or that their own-gender group is better at math and science (Galdi, Cadinu, & Tomasetto, 2014;Heyman & Legare, 2004;Kurtz-Costes, Rowley, Harris-Britt, & Woods, 2008). (For work on the development of implicit gender stereotypes about STEM and how these relate to explicit measures, see Cvencek, Meltzoff, & Greenwald, 2011;Cvencek, Meltzoff, & Kapur, 2014.) Explicit stereotypes about math and science appear to emerge later in development.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Sources Of Gender Gaps In Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, individuals develop implicit self-concepts as a function of implicit stereotypes and group identity (Cadinu & Galdi, 2012;Cvencek et al, 2011;Cvencek et al, 2014;Dijksterhuis et al, 2000;Nosek et al, 2002). Cvencek and colleagues presented evidence indicating that selfconcepts are developmentally dependent on cultural stereotypes and gender identity (Cvencek et al, 2011;Cvencek et al, 2014). Nosek et al (2002) demonstrated that stronger implicit math-gender stereotypes (math = male) corresponded to lower implicit math identity (math ≠ self) for women who implicitly identified with being female rather than male (self = female).…”
Section: The Moderating Roles Of Implicit Stereotypes and Group Identitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nosek et al (2002) demonstrated that stronger implicit math-gender stereotypes (the association of math with male) and implicit gender identity (the association of self with female) corresponded with lower implicit math identity (the association of self with math). As early as elementary school age, children develop an implicit math identity consistent with implicit math-gender stereotypes and gender identity in Western (Cvencek et al, 2011) and Asian cultures (Cvencek, Meltzoff, & Kapur, 2014). Furthermore, Schmader et al (2008) argued that stereotype threat stems from a state of imbalance among these links.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%