2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the paused materials led to significantly higher scores on a transfer test. Similar findings favoring pauses have been reported in other empirical studies (e.g., Hasler et al 2007;Hassanabadi et al 2011;Spanjers et al 2012;Spanjers et al 2011).…”
Section: Demonstration-based-training (Dbt)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the paused materials led to significantly higher scores on a transfer test. Similar findings favoring pauses have been reported in other empirical studies (e.g., Hasler et al 2007;Hassanabadi et al 2011;Spanjers et al 2012;Spanjers et al 2011).…”
Section: Demonstration-based-training (Dbt)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…This prediction is supported in the first line of Table , showing that in 10 of 10 experimental comparisons, involving computer‐based multimedia lessons on lightning, electric motors, pulley systems, how the human eye works, astronomy, history and teaching skills, students who learned with segmented lessons (Boucheix & Schneider, ; Hasler, Kersten, & Sweller, ; Hassanabadi, Robatjazi, & Savoji, ; Lusk et al, ; Mayer & Chandler, , Expt. 2; Mayer, Dow, & Mayer, , Expts.…”
Section: The Case For Using Effective Multimedia In E‐learningmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For example, Stiller, Freitag, Zinnbauer, and Freitag () reported that segmenting improved transfer test performance when the words were printed but produced only a slight effect when they were spoken. In contrast, Hassanabadi, Robatjazi, and Savoji () reported that segmenting improved transfer test performance when the words were spoken but produced only a slight effect when they were printed. Singh, Marcus, and Ayres () reported that segmenting was beneficial both for lessons with spoken text and printed text; however, the largest benefit was with spoken text, perhaps because of the transitory nature of long spoken text passages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%