2010
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181f612e3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive compensation failure in multiple sclerosis

Abstract: High cognitive demand causes beneficial cerebral recruitment failure, leading to cognitive impairment in patients with RRMS. Functional compensatory mechanisms preserving good cognitive performances operate by a new cerebral strategy involving medial prefrontal regions recruitment, instead of cerebellar regions seen in controls. This new recruitment is diffuse tissue damage-dependent. Missing cerebellar involvement argues for an inability to generate proficient cognitive automation processes in patients, direc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms by which cerebellar damage could be associated with IPS impairment have been suggested by several fMRI studies 19–21. In early RRMS, when patients showed normal performances in the easiest levels of the tasks and significantly longer reaction times (slow IPS) during the most demanding cognitive conditions, shorter reaction times were not associated with higher cerebellar activation but with an increase in medial prefrontal activation instead and the functional connectivity analysis showed a functional link between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and medial prefrontal regions but not with the cerebellum 19. These results suggest that patients with MS are unable to activate the typical cerebellofrontal network associated with the fastest responses in the task and that they activate a substitute compensatory network involving the medial prefrontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The mechanisms by which cerebellar damage could be associated with IPS impairment have been suggested by several fMRI studies 19–21. In early RRMS, when patients showed normal performances in the easiest levels of the tasks and significantly longer reaction times (slow IPS) during the most demanding cognitive conditions, shorter reaction times were not associated with higher cerebellar activation but with an increase in medial prefrontal activation instead and the functional connectivity analysis showed a functional link between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and medial prefrontal regions but not with the cerebellum 19. These results suggest that patients with MS are unable to activate the typical cerebellofrontal network associated with the fastest responses in the task and that they activate a substitute compensatory network involving the medial prefrontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Functional MRI studies have found increased activity during PASAT performance in MS (Bonnet et al, 2010, Chiaravalloti et al, 2015, Ksiazek-Winiarek et al, 2015, Morgen et al, 2007, Rocca et al, 2016). Indeed, Morgen et al (2007) found that low PASAT scores correlated with reduction of activation of anterior cingulate cortex, but also with enlarged activation of frontoparietal regions and more widely distributed cortical recruitment as an effort to maintain cognitive functioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifications of the cerebral architecture could be integral mechanisms to maintain optimal network functioning or reflect maladaptive changes promoting clinical dysfunction. Altogether, longitudinal studies are needed to understand the positive or deleterious consequences of brain reorganization (Bonnet et al, 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain reorganization has also been observed in CIS patients when performing cognitive [12] and motor tasks [13]. To better characterize differences in the patterns of brain activations between MS patients and HC, a few studies have also analyzed functional/effective connectivity among different brain regions [14,15,16,17,18]. However, only a seminal study has shown an increased connectivity of brain regions of the working memory network in CIS compared to HC [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%