2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive bias in the chick anxiety–depression model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
104
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there is an experimentally detected effect of so-called cognitive bias in the anxiety-depression type of behavior, where anxious and depressive individuals tend to adopt a pessimistic interpretation of the external stimuli [59,60]. So in these experiments behavioral patterns are also modulated by the consciousness.…”
Section: A Behavioral Compensation Of the Depression-like Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is an experimentally detected effect of so-called cognitive bias in the anxiety-depression type of behavior, where anxious and depressive individuals tend to adopt a pessimistic interpretation of the external stimuli [59,60]. So in these experiments behavioral patterns are also modulated by the consciousness.…”
Section: A Behavioral Compensation Of the Depression-like Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning with the seminal study by Harding, Paul, and Mendl (2004), who introduced a novel approach to determine the emotional states of rats by measuring changes in judgment bias, cognitive bias investigations have been performed in a range of animal species, including rats (Burman, Parker, Paul, & Mendl, 2008, 2009Enkel et al, 2010a;Harding et al, 2004), starlings (Brilot, Asher, & Bateson, 2010;Matheson, Asher, & Bateson, 2008), dogs (Burman et al, 2011;Mendl et al, 2010), sheep (Doyle, Fisher, Hinch, Boissy, & Lee, 2010), chicks (Salmeto et al, 2011), rhesus macaques (Bethell, Semple, Holmes, & MacLarnon, 2007), and even honeybees (Bateson, Desire, Gartside, & Wright, 2011;Mendl, Paul, & Chittka, 2011). While the first attempts to develop appropriate tasks for assessing cognitive bias were based on go/no-go decisions (e.g., Bateson & Matheson, 2007;Harding et al, 2004), the problem of not being able to distinguish between no-go as a response indicator and as a response omission has been overcome by developing go/go tasks, requiring an active response of subjects to both the positive and the negative stimuli (e.g., Brydges, Leach, Nicol, Wright, & Bateson, 2010;Enkel et al, 2010a;Matheson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the first attempts to develop appropriate tasks for assessing cognitive bias were based on go/no-go decisions (e.g., Bateson & Matheson, 2007;Harding et al, 2004), the problem of not being able to distinguish between no-go as a response indicator and as a response omission has been overcome by developing go/go tasks, requiring an active response of subjects to both the positive and the negative stimuli (e.g., Brydges, Leach, Nicol, Wright, & Bateson, 2010;Enkel et al, 2010a;Matheson et al, 2008). Furthermore, a variety of different approaches have been used to manipulate affective state, ranging from unpredictable housing events (Harding et al, 2004) and the provision/removal of environmental enrichment (Brilot et al, 2010;Burman et al, 2008) to the variation of lighting conditions , and including the induction of both negative (Harding et al, 2004;Salmeto et al, 2011) and positive (Brydges et al, 2010;Burman et al, 2011) emotional states. Notably, there has been a strong emphasis on the study of negative, rather than positive, affective states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuropsychological tests of emotional processing almost exclusively utilise stimuli-for instance, facial images or words-that cannot be used with nonhuman animals. On the basis of the same neurocognitive theories that underpin these methods, but working with dimensions that are not species specific, cognitive affective biases have been demonstrated in a number of animal species (Brilot, Asher, & Bateson, 2010;Brydges, Leach, Nicol, Wright, & Bateson, 2011;Doyle et al, 2011;Salmeto et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%