Cognitive behavioural therapy group work with voice hearers. Part 2

McLeod, Terry; Morris, Mervyn; Birchwood, Max; Dovey, Alan

doi:10.12968/bjon.2007.16.5.23005

Cited by 23 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We note that a large number of studies identified by our search did not include an attendance rate (e.g. Borras et al, 2009; Landa, Silverstein, Schwartz, & Savitz, 2006; Leclerc, Lesage, Ricard, Lecomte, & Cyr, 2000; Liberman et al, 1984; Lysaker & Bell, 1995; McLeod, Morris, Birchwood, & Dovey, 2007; Owen, Sellwood, Stephen, Murray, & Sarsam, 2015; Spidel, Lecomte, Kealy, & Daigneault, 2018; Wallace & Liberman, 1985).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of adherence to group interventions in psychosis: do people attend?

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Evidence supports the use of group therapy for symptom reduction and improving functioning in people with psychosis. However, research guidelines highlight the importance of establishing the feasibility of interventions. Adherence is an important indicator of feasibility and an essential step in supporting the development of the evidence base for group interventions. This review aims to estimate adherence, and possible barriers and facilitators, to psychotherapeutic groups in people with psychosis. Methods Embase, Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched for cross-referencing terms related to group therapy and psychosis. Studies were assessed against inclusion criteria and methodological quality was evaluated. Data wasextracted from each paper including the average session attendance, demographic, clinical, study and therapy-related characteristics and the impact of these on adherence levels evaluated. Results Fifty-nine original research papers were included, reporting on 52 independent studies which consisted of 66 therapy groups comprised of 2109 participants. Average adherence was 76.4% (s.d. = 17.4). Adherence was improved by receiving incentives and was higher in participants of older age. Study sample size was inversely associated with adherence levels. Study quality was variable with approximately 61.5% found to be at risk of bias. The results support the feasibility of group therapy and suggest that adherence in people with psychosis is not dissimilar to those for people experiencing common mental health difficulties. These findings, alongside efficacy evidence, support the use of group interventions in people with psychosis but also highlight the need for further high-quality research on the efficacy for these approaches.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of adherence to group interventions in psychosis: do people attend?

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analyses (Lewis et al, 2002;Durham et al, 2003;Trower et al, 2004;Cather et al, 2005;Valmaggia et al, 2005;Wykes et al, 2005;McLeod et al, 2007aMcLeod et al, , 2007bO'Connor et al, 2007;Garety et al, 2008;Haddock et al, 2009;Penn et al, 2009;Foster et al, 2010;Peters et al, 2010;Lincoln et al, 2012;Krakvik et al, 2013;Leff et al, 2013;Rathod et al, 2013;Morrison et al, in press). Fifteen studies reported on hallucinations and twelve on delusions.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of individually tailored formulation-based cognitive behavioural therapy in auditory hallucinations and delusions: A meta-analysis

Gaag

Valmaggia

Smit

2014

Schizophrenia Research

219

177

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is no meta-analysis of cognitive behavioural therapy for delusions and hallucinations separately. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the end-of-treatment effects of individually tailored case-formulation cognitive behavioural therapy on delusions and auditory hallucinations using symptom-specific outcome measures. A systematic search of the trial literature was conducted in MEDLINE, PSYCHINFO and EMBASE. Eighteen studies were selected with symptom specific outcome measures. Hedges' g was computed and outcomes were pooled meta-analytically using the random-effects model. Our main analyses were with the selected studies with CBT using individually tailored case-formulation that aimed to reduce hallucinations and delusions. The statistically significant effect-sizes were 0.36 with delusions and 0.44 with hallucinations, which are modest and in line with other recent meta-analyses. Contrasted with active treatment, CBT for delusions lost statistical significance (0.33), but the effect-size for CBT for hallucinations increased (0.49). Blinded studies reduced effect-size in delusions (0.24) and gained some in hallucinations (0.46). There was no heterogeneity in hallucinations and moderate heterogeneity in delusion trials. We conclude that CBT is effective in treating auditory hallucinations. CBT for delusions is also effective, but the results must be interpreted with caution, because of heterogeneity and the non-significant effect-sizes when compared with active treatment.

show abstract

“…Par ailleurs, les HA sont persistantes chez 25 à 50% de ces personnes malgré la prise de médicaments neuroleptiques (Newton et coll., 2005). Une approche qui a démontré son efficacité auprès de ces personnes est l'intervention de groupe, que ce soit d'ordre cognitivo-comportemental ou de soutien (McLeod, Morris, Birchwood & Dovey, 2007;Penn et coll., 2009;Rudlle, Mason & Wykes, 2011;Wykes et coll., 2005). Ce type d'intervention permet l'échange de stratégies, la hausse de l'estime personnelle ainsi que la diminution de la stigmatisation.…”

Section: Bien Que De 10 à 15% De La Population Générale Qui Entend Desunclassified

Le jumelage d’un suivi de groupe à un suivi individualisé axé sur les forces auprès de personnes qui entendent des voix

Breault-Ruel¹,

St-Onge²

2016

cswr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we present the findings of qualitative research on the perception of people who hear disturbing voices regarding their social integration. These people participated in a support group combined with individualized follow-up based on the strengths model developed by Rapp and Goscha (2006). A semi-structured individual interview was completed with six people. In addition to the strengths model, the findings were interpreted based on the bioecological model developed by Bronfenbrenner (2005). This research reveals that the combination of these two aspects is beneficial for the participants and creates hope for them. Timely calls to action were made including recommendations to foster greater social integration of individuals who hear voices through the realization of life plans.

show abstract

Cognitive behavioural therapy group work with voice hearers. Part 2

Cited by 23 publications

References 8 publications

A systematic review of adherence to group interventions in psychosis: do people attend?

A systematic review of adherence to group interventions in psychosis: do people attend?

The effects of individually tailored formulation-based cognitive behavioural therapy in auditory hallucinations and delusions: A meta-analysis

Le jumelage d’un suivi de groupe à un suivi individualisé axé sur les forces auprès de personnes qui entendent des voix

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About