2016
DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2016.1200884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive-behavior therapy: why is it so vilified in the chronic fatigue syndrome community?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale [41] might also be adapted for ME and CFS, as the scale targets psychosocial functioning. Research should use longitudinal designs with these measures [4,5,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale [41] might also be adapted for ME and CFS, as the scale targets psychosocial functioning. Research should use longitudinal designs with these measures [4,5,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterization of ME/CFS as a psychosomatic illness has led to the belief that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) are therapeutic if not curative (6). The publications demonstrating the therapeutic and potentially curative values of CBT and GET have now been challenged (18). Attempts to correct the literature are currently underway (29).…”
Section: The Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of treatment and therapeutic approach varies among countries. Some countries lack awareness of ME/CFS (16), others subscribe to ME/CFS as treatable by changing the way the patient thinks and behaves through a CBT approach (17, 18), while some have embraced ME/CFS being an organic disease in practice (19) but fail to reach all patients and caregivers in need (20). Recently, O'Leary (21) has put forward the argument that despite a previous, long-term, professional consensus that CFS be classified as a psychosomatic illness, the insistence of globally respected health authorities that ME/CFS be treated as a serious, biological disease (1) raises ethical concerns as to whether efforts to continue treating ME/CFS as a mental disorder (in the U.K.) should continue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who have ME and CFS, but are misdiagnosed with depression, may feel stigmatized, delegitimized, and may be prescribed potentially harmful treatments (Twisk and Maes, 2009). Particularly with recovery, patients with ME and CFS may experience disappointment, frustration, and hopelessness when they do not improve after receiving treatments designed for depression (Friedberg, 2016). Some research has demonstrated psychological treatments, like CBT, to be harmful for patients with ME and CFS (Twisk and Maes, 2009), but helpful for patients with depression (Friedberg and Krupp, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%