2009 Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icimp.2009.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive-Based Biometrics System for Static User Authentication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All identified systems utilize static challenges like clicking points on screen [36], navigating through a maze [37] or clicking special rhythms [38] to collect movement and keystroke information. Combination with additional features is done by Hamdy et al [39], who tried to measure short-term memory and perceptual capabilities. However, all mouse-based systems show high error rates.…”
Section: Authentication Systems Overview 311 Conventional Authenticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All identified systems utilize static challenges like clicking points on screen [36], navigating through a maze [37] or clicking special rhythms [38] to collect movement and keystroke information. Combination with additional features is done by Hamdy et al [39], who tried to measure short-term memory and perceptual capabilities. However, all mouse-based systems show high error rates.…”
Section: Authentication Systems Overview 311 Conventional Authenticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides this system, many other novel biometric systems expect to give an alternative to the well known biometric systems based on fingerprints. There are analyses of systems based on hand geometry [ 22 ], on finger geometry [ 23 ], on finger veins [ 24 ] or even on the mouse dynamics [ 25 ], amongst others.…”
Section: Test Acoustic Profiles For Biometric Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this first system, Mean Square Error (MSE) between two images of the same frequency and position is used to compare the acoustic profiles, defining a global error as the sum of the errors associated with each image of the profile. Using the Equal Error Rate (EER) as a quality indicator, this system obtained an EER value of 6.22%, such as other emerging biometric identification systems [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%