Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to Daily Events: The Effects of Self‐Esteem and Self‐Complexity

Abstract

In this article we examine the effects of self-esteem and self-complexity on cognitive appraisals of daily events and emotional lability. Subjects (n = 67) participated in a 2-week diary study; each day they made five mood ratings, described the most positive and negative events of the day, and rated these two events on six appraisal measures. Neither self-esteem nor self-complexity was related to an extremity measure of mood variability. Both traits were negatively related to measures assessing the frequency of mood change, although the effect of self-complexity dissipated when self-esteem was taken into account. Self-esteem (but not self-complexity) was also related to event appraisals: Subjects with low self-esteem rated their daily events as less positive and as having more impact on their moods. Subjects with high self-esteem made more internal, stable, global attributions for positive events than for negative events, whereas subjects low in self-esteem made similar attributions for both types of events and viewed their negative events as being more personally important than did subjects high in self-esteem. Despite these self-esteem differences in subjects' views of their daily events, naive judges (n = 63) who read the event descriptions and role-played their appraisals of them generally did not distinguish between the events that had been experienced by low self-esteem versus high self-esteem diary subjects.

The Dynamic Nature of Cultural Identity Throughout Cultural Transitions: Why Home Is Not So Sweet

“…Among these are the extent of the integration of dimensions of self-knowledge (Donahue, Robins, Roberts, & John, 1993), self-complexity (Linville, 1985), and the compartmentalization of negative and positive selves (Showers, 1992). Of particular interest is the finding that self-concept complexity and flexibility were positively related to self-esteem such that high-self-esteem individuals claimed they were capable of a wide range of behaviors when required by the situation (Campbell, Chew, & Scratchley, 1991;Paulhus & Martin, 1988).…”

Does Being Attractive Always Help? Positive and Negative Effects of Attractiveness on Social Decision Making

“…Threatening social events tend to have greater negative impact on people with low self-esteem (Campbell, Chew, & Scratchley, 1991). Low self-esteem people respond to negative social information with feelings of shame and humiliation (Brown & Dutton, 1995).…”

Self-esteem and persistence in the face of failure.

“…One dimension emphasued by several investigaton to be of central importance is attributional globality-the extent to which the cause of a failure is attributed to global factors (e.g., "1 la& the intelligence to do well at most thingstt) or more specific factors (e.g., "Rote memorization is not my cup of tea") (e.g., Abramson, Seligman, & Teasdale, 1978;Weiner, 1985). HSE and LSE individuals differ in their attributional tendencies along the globality dimension, with LSE individuals tending to attribute failure to more global factors (Campbell, Chew, & Scratchley, 1991;Cohen, van den Bout, van Vliet, & Kramer, 1989;Peterson, Schwartz, & Seligman, 1981).…”