2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/4n2jm
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive and cultural models in psychological science: A tutorial on modeling free-list data as a dependent variable in Bayesian regression

Abstract: Assessing relationships between culture and cognition is central to psychological science. To this end, free-listing is a useful methodological instrument. To facilitate its wider use, we here present the free-list method along with some of its many applications and offer a tutorial on how to prepare and statistically model free-list data as a dependent variable in Bayesian regression using openly available data and code. We further demonstrate the real-world utility of the outlined workflow by modeling within… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Free-listing might therefore be a more appropriate measure of a deity's degree of moral concern than pre-fabricated item scales used in previous studies. In fact, a recent cross-cultural methodological analysis (Bendixen and Purzycki, 2023b) failed to find clear evidence of within-subject agreement between the three-item ‘moral interest scale’ from Lang et al (2019) and Purzycki et al (2016b) and a corollary free-list task, hinting at a dissociation between these two instruments. While free-lists are more often used for descriptive or exploratory purposes (e.g.…”
Section: Hypotheses Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Free-listing might therefore be a more appropriate measure of a deity's degree of moral concern than pre-fabricated item scales used in previous studies. In fact, a recent cross-cultural methodological analysis (Bendixen and Purzycki, 2023b) failed to find clear evidence of within-subject agreement between the three-item ‘moral interest scale’ from Lang et al (2019) and Purzycki et al (2016b) and a corollary free-list task, hinting at a dissociation between these two instruments. While free-lists are more often used for descriptive or exploratory purposes (e.g.…”
Section: Hypotheses Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ideal method for soliciting naturalistic, discrete, and quantifiable ethnographic data is the free-list method (Bendixen and Purzycki, n.d.b;Quinlan, 2005;Smith, 1993;Smith and Borgatti, 1997). In this task, participants list items that represent their knowledge about some topic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research question 2, model comparisons helped us choose between models 1 and 2 for the inspection of point estimates and 95% CIs corresponding to the effects of grade and home language. In this paper, models were compared using the expected log pointwise predictive density (ELPD; Vehtari et al, 2017) a measure of overall fit and out-of-sample predictive accuracy (Bendixen & Purzycki, 2022). Using the loo package in R, the ELPD and its standard error were calculated using approximate leave-one-out cross-validation (Vehtari et al, 2018).…”
Section: Bayesian Framework Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%