2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000170834.54970.f5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive and Affective Determinants of Decisions to Attend a Group Psychosocial Support Program for Women With Breast Cancer

Abstract: Participation in the group psychosocial support program appeared to be guided by cognitive and affective factors identified by the Common-Sense Model. Psychosocial support programs and informational materials promoting their use may attract more participants if they are tailored to focus on resolving cancer-related distress rather than on general anxiety or depression, appeal to those with high avoidance tendencies, address the role of immune function in cancer progression, and meet the needs of older particip… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the univariate analysis, non-participants of internet groups were found to use cognitive avoidance and fatalism in coping with cancer to a greater extent than internet support group users, indicating that the emotional and supportive interaction within an internet-based support group does not appeal to cancer survivors who use these coping strategies in their adjustment to cancer. This is in line with a previous study showing that cancer patients who decline information or participation in psychosocial support programs are found to employ passive and avoidant coping strategies [19]. When accounting for socioeconomic position, the observed difference in fatalism between users and non-users of internet groups disappeared.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the univariate analysis, non-participants of internet groups were found to use cognitive avoidance and fatalism in coping with cancer to a greater extent than internet support group users, indicating that the emotional and supportive interaction within an internet-based support group does not appeal to cancer survivors who use these coping strategies in their adjustment to cancer. This is in line with a previous study showing that cancer patients who decline information or participation in psychosocial support programs are found to employ passive and avoidant coping strategies [19]. When accounting for socioeconomic position, the observed difference in fatalism between users and non-users of internet groups disappeared.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Enfin, certaines sous-échelles semblent être privilégiées en fonction de l'objectif de la recherche ou autrement dit de la variable qu'elle vise à expliquer. Par exemple, les études qui tentent de comprendre les déterminants du recours aux soins de support utilisent les sous-échelles de contrôle personnel et de représentations émotionnelles de la maladie [25,33]. De plus, certains auteurs adaptent les sous-échelles en y ajoutant des items, élaborés sur la base d'études qualitatives préalables, non couverts par le questionnaire [24] ou en y retirant [25] des items.…”
Section: Résultatsunclassified
“…As far as we know, only few studies have investigated these questions. Those that have [e.g., 8,13,17,18,36,41] focused on patient-specific characteristics and attitudes that determine their intention to participate and their actual participation in POS (see Fig. 1, variables without a black frame).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%